Wow, thanks Gyro, that's a whole load of stress, added to all the more regular hassles.
Reminds me, that many doctors have a cultivated sense of responsibilities, and so just the act of bringing something up, some curious medical situation, always causes (the doctor) to feel obligated to respond, and 'solve' the issue.
So, while a patient might simply have some curiosity, rather than some 'demand' for cure, you have to, somehow, get him/or her to relax.
In older times, one might cross legs, on the exam table, break out a pack of cigarettes, and say some chit-chat thing;
"HEY DOC; (I noticed some weird facial things...)".
But seems like today's busy doctor hasn't time, for patient's technical curiousity. Hmmm.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, today, I've a related Calculus problem, question:
As shown in attached diagram, having a 'sweep', similar to old radar screens, a sweeping line that is measuring the light intensity, will produce a waveform...obviously only a positive number, intensity, and then using that, to generate a First Derivative, or slope of the intensity at one particular arc.
Of course, I made the skew rate reasonable, by blurring each object slightly. But then I've realized, that slope, or first derivative of intensity will have negative values and positive. So that's a little weird, unexpected. I can do the math, blindly, (no intended pun), but real world light intensity, at least, has no negative values.
Just a curiousity...no need to fix anything..
Please see enclosed diagram, of sweep across an image. Thanks.