...ok, now it's time to find myself a reason why I absolutely needed to order this little thingy
(Attachment Link)
When you find out, let me know. I've been asking myself the same thing for over a year, while looking for situations where it would be a better solution than the DSA815-TG that it's sitting beside.
McBryce.
Well, of course I started with attaching the antenna and checking what's out there on air. This device has a rudimentary "listen" function and a 3.5 mm audio jack output, so I used it. Apparently it can decode both AM and FM, and that happens transparently: there seems to be no setting to choose the mod. type.
Discovered that there's *a lot* still going on in the SW band, managed to receive something that sounded like Chinese (?!) at ~7.35-7.42 MHz, some apparently UK-based station which told a story about Her Majesty at 10-ish MHz IIRC, and a lot of others.
That's fun, but to do that seriously I would need a better antenna and a proper radio, of course.
Found some peaks in the ~195-202 MHz range, which are dedicated to radio broadcasting, per our regulations, but couldn't pick any voice there (but I need to retry during day time, as that time I tried it in the middle of the night).
It's weird that it's not level-calibrated above 5.35 GHz from factory. Why? They expect the users to have their own 5.35 GHz signal source and use that. Well yeah sure I have loads of those sitting on my desk. Not that I really need to measure anything that high, was just curious if my 802.11ac WiFi signal would show up, for which level calibration isn't required anyway, as a relative measurement would be fine too. It didn't show up, though, maybe I was doing something wrong.
The signal generator is rudimentary: frequency accuracy is so-so, jitter is terrible, and output level stability is questionable, but it still may come in handy if you need a RF signal and don't have any other generator. AM modulation seems to use what looks like a 3-bit DAC to set the amplitude.
On the other hand, when I enabled the Cal output, the 10 MHz frequency accuracy there was really good -- from my initial estimation (via a freq counter with a known error at 10 MHz), it was very close, below 1 ppm, to my GPSDO, but I need to repeat this test with them sitting side by side.
As far as its primary purpose, which analyzing spectra, it seems to be quite good, well, that's what it's popular for. What would I use it for besides checking what radio waves are out there? Can be used to estimate how clean a generator's sine wave output is. Or, I'm going to try to estimate edge speeds of the pulses produced by my pulse generator, which is faster than my scope is capable of, using the method described in
tggzzz's blog, but I'm waiting for some feed-through attenuators to arrive first.
Menu tree can give clues to what else can be done using it. I haven't yet dived into all of that.
missed this part:
while looking for situations where it would be a better solution than the DSA815-TG that it's sitting beside.
I don't have any other SA, so obviously for me it's first of all an SA. But other than that... Portability, at least, and maybe something else.