Author Topic: So, have I got this radiation calculation correct?(and another related question)  (Read 3362 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline XOIIOTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1625
  • Country: ca
So, I finally got something radioactive, an old bullfinch mantle, complete with thorium and asbestos string.

Now, assuming my Geiger counter is reasonably accurate (last calibrated in 84 I believe, yes it is a bit out of date), this puts of at most around 4 milliroentgen per hour peak (when the meter is right against the thickest quantity of the mantle).

So, that converts to 34.78 microsieverts, and according to the xkcd chart, a flight from NY to LA is 40 microsieverts, so in effect, holding the mantle in my hand for 1 hour would expose said hand to just under the amount of radiation my whole body would experience in one flight.

Also, based on that, I think that I would need to hold the mantle in my hand for 1,437 hours to reach the safe annual radiation dosage for radiation workers, or 966 hours for civilians (at least in that hand)

Just wondering if someone can confirm I have got that all straight, or perhaps I made a mistake somewhere.

http://xkcd.com/radiation/
http://www.convert-me.com/en/convert/radiation/


I also want to make something with an arduino that can hook up to the headphone connector and count the clicks to calculate and give this information automatically, but I think that it might not work so well, or at least it would be a bit off, since it clicks quite rapidly when the radiation gets decently strong, I'm not sure if they might overlap to much to cause an issue. The "clicks" seem to max out about half a volt, and I'm curious what would be the best way to pick up those signals safely, without risk of 5v from the arduino being piped into geiger counter. Never dealt with opto-isolators before but that seems like a good start, I could also use pointers on how you go about turning a signal like that into an input, I'm not sure if it would be as simple as setting it up similar to a button. It's 5v dc so it wouldn't need an analog to digital converter I don't think, it does just make a piezo speaker click.

Pictures to make it a bit more interesting:




Online Someone

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4674
  • Country: au
    • send complaints here
So, have I got this radiation calculation correct?

Now, assuming my Geiger counter is reasonably accurate (last calibrated in 84 I believe, yes it is a bit out of date), this puts of at most around 4 milliroentgen per hour peak (when the meter is right against the thickest quantity of the mantle).

So, that converts to 34.78 microsieverts, and according to the xkcd chart, a flight from NY to LA is 40 microsieverts, so in effect, holding the mantle in my hand for 1 hour would expose said hand to just under the amount of radiation my whole body would experience in one flight.
Short answer is no, you dont have it right :)

The long answer is twofold, the radiation follows the inverse square rule so will decay quickly away from the localised source, and the weighting functions for the body parts vary wildly. It can be hard to get good information and the wikipedia article is lacking https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_dose_(radiation) but the basic result is that a health physicist would allow huge localised absorbed doses to the hands compared to the whole body dose (or equivalent thereof). Its an area of ongoing research and there is a lot of training/learning on the road to become a competent health physicist:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_physics
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certified_Health_Physicist
 

Offline XOIIOTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1625
  • Country: ca
So, have I got this radiation calculation correct?

Now, assuming my Geiger counter is reasonably accurate (last calibrated in 84 I believe, yes it is a bit out of date), this puts of at most around 4 milliroentgen per hour peak (when the meter is right against the thickest quantity of the mantle).

So, that converts to 34.78 microsieverts, and according to the xkcd chart, a flight from NY to LA is 40 microsieverts, so in effect, holding the mantle in my hand for 1 hour would expose said hand to just under the amount of radiation my whole body would experience in one flight.
Short answer is no, you dont have it right :)

The long answer is twofold, the radiation follows the inverse square rule so will decay quickly away from the localised source, and the weighting functions for the body parts vary wildly. It can be hard to get good information and the wikipedia article is lacking https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_dose_(radiation) but the basic result is that a health physicist would allow huge localised absorbed doses to the hands compared to the whole body dose (or equivalent thereof). Its an area of ongoing research and there is a lot of training/learning on the road to become a competent health physicist:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_physics
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certified_Health_Physicist

Yeah, the whole radiation amount to dose isn't a super simple thing lol, plus depending on the radiation type it could just be stopped by the skin, I just wanted to know if I had it right in theory. I doubt holding it for 966 hours would give my hand 1000uSv of radiation unless I had a regulated source of gamma radiation (which considering I am not bruce banner, I do not have)

The mantle is only putting off beta radiation, no gamma, and sadly I don't have one of the much rarer alpha radiation detecting 700's so who knows lol. It is thorium though so you can make an educated guess.

Offline Stonent

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3824
  • Country: us
Geiger counters can only be used to measure counts for anything other than what they are calibrated for. If your cdv700 has radium then you can accurately measure radium. If it has depleted uranium then that's what you can measure.

Most modern counters are calibrated to Cs137.

One click of Plutonium has a lot different energy than one click of Potassium 40. So the roentgens and sieverts scale has to be different.
The larger the government, the smaller the citizen.
 

Offline Stonent

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3824
  • Country: us
Also these cdv700 units pulse at -18V so you need to factor that in since it is not suitable for an arduino. A 2k resistor should suffice I think for the input to an optocoupler at 18v. Please someone correct me if wrong.
The larger the government, the smaller the citizen.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf