If the UK and US had listened to the UN and not invaded Iraq we wouldn't have had this problem to begin with.
Not really,
the UN had already unanimously passed Resolution 1441. "a final opportunity to comply with its disarmament obligations"
The only reason that did not technically sanction war was the stronger wording of previous resolutions, so the eighteenth resolution was proposed with majority UN member support, but then withdrawn because France decided it wasn't going to support a deadline.
Iraq continued to dick everyone around until Bush decided to pull the trigger on going to war.
Your suggestion that this was wholly against the will of the UN is misleading.
What caused the current hell in the middle east is mainly the Iraq war.
Not really,
unless you want to go back to the formation of Israel.
The background to most of this was the Iranian Islamic revolution, where once again muslims decide that a violent theocracy is the way forward for the world and instigated the rebirth of political Islam.
Iraq's fear of a Shia insurgency then led to the Iran-Iraq war and the development of chemical weapons. The same chemical weapons that led to the later invasion by the US/UK.
Christian mobs burned down the library of Alexandria
Not really,
yes the Crusaders burned a few muslim books, however the entirety of the contents were lost when the muslims invaded Constantinople in 1453.
Which is somewhat academic considering the library was actually founded by the Christian, Constantius II, primarily so the works of Greek literature could be preserved.
It was probably Caesar's troops that accidentally burnt it down, or maybe Caliph Omar.
If the muslims didn't see fit to preserve their own history and left it up to a Christian to do it for them, then hard cheese if the Crusaders come along later and burn the lot.
It's not like ISIS are any different in their attitude to preserving the history of islam.
Let me translate that sign for you: "with the people, for the fatherland".
"Fosterland" translates as Motherland doesn't it? Which lacks any Nazi associations I think.
You have not heard of the bombing and massacre in Norway 5 years ago by a right wing extremist?
Which was merely a reaction to muslim immigration, if you weren't importing an alien culture then it wouldn't have happened. If you change a society overnight and then suppress all opposition to it, then expect a violent reaction.
Muslim terrorism is inevitably down to something happening thousands of miles away, entirely because they all consider themselves one big psychotic family.
You don't get Methodists beheading people when someone sniggers at their Bible do you?
The EU asylum seekers need to be distributed fairly and evenly among all the member states
Why? Why make people travel 5000km instead of simply walking next door to the refugee camps in Lebanon, waiting a year or so, then go back home and carry on?
Why is Sweden's solution the best one for dealing with this, when it's kind of obvious that it has directly precipitated Brexit and created a social nightmare for Sweden for decades to come.
Name one country (other than Sweden) on the
entire planet that wishes it had accepted more muslims.
Nope, nobody, nada, no one - because everyone else is pointing at Sweden and saying
"WTF were they thinking.... "