Simon
What that tells us is that everyone has their own reasons for voting the way they did.
There is a rather ugly trait from many people who should know better who have been prejudging and stereotyping what they see as a Leave voter, generally along the lines of accusations of racism, bogotry, xenophobia, being ignorant, uneducated, gullible, or any combination of those things. All of which I find interesting because such prejuducial mantra isn't what I would expect from some of those spewing the vitriol. When challenenged it's, "Oh, I don't mean you"... errrr, well, who did you mean?!!
Certainly in my own case, my own concerns were over increased federalisation, fiscal parity and continued expansion into fiscally incompatible states, and nobody can explain what the benefit of any of that is other than for the self serving EU gravy train.
The EU in its original form, the EEC, or Common Market, was meant to create a common trading area, but along the line it has been successively morphed into something quite different, and something that is out of control, accountable only to itself, and is apparently unstoppable. If that is what the EU's idea of reform is, I don't want it thank you.
If the remain campaign had offered any evidence that the EU is capable of reform away from their current super state mentality, I am sure many would have thought differently.
Regarding the lies, it was hardly difficult to be able to see that things like claiming all the £350m pw going to the EU was going to be put into the NHS was bollocks. There have been a few others presented like this, somewhat repetitively, but I think it's rather naive to suggest that a voter couldn't see through it. I could equally well spell out plenty of lies from the remain side, such as the denials that Turkey was to join, or that the EU is capable of reform, or that the UK could negotiate anything more than tiny breadcrumbs.
This fella pretty much explains my view in general as far as I'm concerned: