It totally makes sance to reuse heat from servers, cryptominers, rendering farms etc.
While it certainly can have some niche applications, and I don't doubt you have a great product here, my point was that it made absolutely no sense to cool down a desktop PC, which was the point of the thread.
Even for servers, that's something that would be used with a lot of thought. Not just submerging the whole hardware in mineral oil. The resulting weight would be enormous (causing specific issues for mounting purposes) and, it would render any maintenance a horrific process.
I completely agree. Immersion Cooling is not for desktop PC cooling (although You can do it - history of this post shows that.
Our installations are achieving PUE at < 1.04 One of the best DCs in my region (air cooled) are proud to get lowest PUE at around 1.2
Think about OPEX and savings on cooling (which is one of the biggest parts of OPEX costs for DC).
You are removing noise and vibrations - completely. Virtually, there is no noise
Maintenance: That is correct. It's not horrific process BUT requires different approach. I do totally agree in that point. On the other hand keep in mind all the advantages of the instalaltions: lower power usage, no noise, no dust, better cooling and what is MOST important for me - EASE OF HEAT REUSING
Lower temperatures is also a field for overclocking if needed or lowering power usage even more - with lower temperature comes lower power useage at same CPU frequency . Paper towels shouldn't stop You from choosing right direction.
Once again, I would like to point out that we are not using mineral oils. We have
fully synthetic immersion cooling liquid [physico-chemical properties are on our web page]
Weight Yes - that is a thing to consider. Especially when with immersion cooling You can achievie MUCH HIGHER hardware density per square meter. But hey, we are engineers - everything can be calculated and designed.
Paweł.