Author Topic: Stock Electronic Image FAILS  (Read 281729 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Housedad

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 514
  • Country: us
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #300 on: November 23, 2018, 12:46:05 am »
I am fairly sure that the quality of their "100% online" education matches the quality of their advertising. That's what you get with "100% online" - no labs so nobody to show you how a scope probe works ...

They give you a stupid pictoral diagram and expect you to practice with a stick. :-DD

Oh, you mean the way I'm learning on my own now.  At least I saved all that tuition money. :)
« Last Edit: November 23, 2018, 12:47:42 am by Housedad »
At least I'm still older than my test equipment
 

Offline mc172

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 489
  • Country: gb
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #301 on: December 30, 2018, 08:49:09 pm »
Not sure if this has been posted before but I found this on the front page of the AVX footprint guide.

https://www.avx.com/download/software/literature/AVX-Footprint-Library.pdf

 
The following users thanked this post: Bud

Offline schmitt trigger

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2292
  • Country: mx
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #302 on: December 30, 2018, 09:31:06 pm »
The saving grace on this photo is the use of a very narrow depth of field makes an interesting image from an otherwise pedestrian subject.
 
The following users thanked this post: Bud

Offline floobydust

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7280
  • Country: ca
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #303 on: December 30, 2018, 09:56:11 pm »
It's fake depth-of-field blur and fake smoke. That brand new soldering iron made a few more stock pics:  https://www.shutterstock.com/g/Niyazz?searchterm=component
 

Offline Brumby

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 12355
  • Country: au
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #304 on: December 31, 2018, 12:46:03 am »
Yeah - that iron doesn't look like it's seen the sun on a hot day, let alone get hot enough to melt solder.

That previous one with the probe, though ....  Is that TIG welding I see?
 

Offline Edison

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 263
  • Country: cz
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #305 on: January 01, 2019, 03:36:42 am »
So now I am amused, best for New Year's eve   :-DD :-DD :-DD
Everything works as the weakest link in the chain
 

Offline timelessbeing

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 929
  • Country: 00
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #306 on: March 31, 2019, 12:23:30 am »
GOLD!



I wonder why that's such a popular image.
Here is a major electronics distributor. Does nobody at the company object to this?

 

Offline amyk

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8344
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #307 on: March 31, 2019, 04:56:23 am »
Being a distributor just means they sell stuff, not necessarily that they know about the things they're selling...
 

Offline electromotive

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 87
  • Country: us
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #308 on: March 31, 2019, 05:23:57 am »
ok not electronic releadet but a translate fail:


from a Ebay Seller.
Run for my life?  :scared: Does the sell so much crap....  :wtf:  :-DD

Looks like they ran themselves into an arrhythmia and died by the looks of it.
 
The following users thanked this post: Naguissa, magic

Offline Brumby

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 12355
  • Country: au
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #309 on: March 31, 2019, 06:20:45 am »
Reminds me of a story where a young American soldier on a base in Vietnam was sent over to ask the Aussies if they could borrow their cherry picker.  The request was approved with the line "Go for your life" - which the young soldier apparently took the wrong way and scampered off like an Olympic sprinter.
 

Offline timelessbeing

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 929
  • Country: 00
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #310 on: March 31, 2019, 06:40:59 am »
Being a distributor just means they sell stuff, not necessarily that they know about the things they're selling...

"Future Electronics’ Advanced Engineers are system design experts, with in-depth knowledge on a variety of design approaches ... Advanced Engineers are Factory Certified by a range of suppliers on a wide breadth of technologies... These highly trained Advanced Engineers are an extension of our suppliers’ engineering teams"

Large pictures like that emblazoned across a website just don't portray "highly trained" to me.  :palm:
« Last Edit: March 31, 2019, 06:43:58 am by timelessbeing »
 

Offline Homer J Simpson

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1231
  • Country: us
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #311 on: May 13, 2019, 08:15:04 pm »


Check out 8:30 to 9:00

 
The following users thanked this post: jklasdf, helius, Brumby, gnavigator1007, BrianHG, schmitt trigger

Offline PA0PBZ

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5171
  • Country: nl
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #312 on: May 13, 2019, 08:58:52 pm »
Keyboard error: Press F1 to continue.
 
The following users thanked this post: Synthtech

Offline lowimpedance

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1255
  • Country: au
  • Watts in an ohm?
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #313 on: May 14, 2019, 12:00:30 am »
 :wtf:...... :-DD...... no wonder things went fubar.
The odd multimeter or 2 or 3 or 4...or........can't remember !.
 
The following users thanked this post: Yansi

Offline Red Squirrel

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2751
  • Country: ca
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #314 on: May 14, 2019, 03:43:19 am »
Did..... they just connect jumper cables straight to a chip package?  :-DD

And was that a motherboard, like, for a computer?  :-DD

I think I actually saw this documentary, I never noticed the absurdity of those parts.   |O
 

Offline Whales

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2000
  • Country: au
    • Halestrom
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #315 on: May 14, 2019, 03:54:45 am »
Ah, the PLCC-AB holder variant with large power-rail pads on either side of the holder.  Beautiful to see them, they're not very popular these days.
 
The following users thanked this post: tooki, Ysjoelfir

Offline McBryce

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2704
  • Country: de
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #316 on: May 14, 2019, 06:21:44 am »
If you have your own nuclear power source you can afford to have power hungry ICs.  :palm:

McBryce.
30 Years making cars more difficult to repair.
 

Offline Cyberdragon

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2676
  • Country: us
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #317 on: May 16, 2019, 06:19:13 am »
Talking about cringeworthy nuclear facilities, I have a story to share.

My professor was working on a consulting job where he needed a personal favor from me testing some power devices for a generator of a nuclear plant which I will not disclose.

Through the project, I was given more information on the plant, and I am really glad that I don't live close it.

The nuclear plant has two diesel generators per nuclear generator in case there's a total loss of grid power and a nuclear generator failure as well as a local grid failure that prevents energy from the grid, the reactor itself or another reactor in the plant, to feed power to the cooling system.

The plant uses Fukushima design, and we all know what happens if it loses all cooling power.

Each diesel generator runs on a non-inverter design (it was designed in the 70s), and it has an exciting field coil driven by an AC-DC converter that stabilizes output voltage (AVC/AGC).

The exciting coil driver is based on SCRs, fed directly from the output of the generator.

Well, here's the problem. On safety drills, they discovered each of their generators fails every around 100 hours of operation, and they tasked us to find out why.

Here's the fun part after we inspected the driver:

1. There's absolutely no decoupling on ICs. Analog chips and discrete logic chips are powered without local decoupling caps, and there're no decoupling planes. Two layer boards, that's it.
2. There's no di/dt and dv/dt protection on gate drivers. The units started to fail in the new century as old diodes ran out, and new diodes are faster, thus creating more di/dt. They tried to source old-design diodes from an Indian company making so called 100% clone of old devices, but apparently the new clones are way faster than the old ones.
3. They literally used LM723 as opamps. That's right, they never had a single real opamp in their circuit.
4. Their over voltage protection uses a selenium rectifier as zener stack, and the connection is through a 4m roundtrip cable. That offers zero protection on transients.
5. Their driver is based on SCRs, and common sense tells me if you use a majority carrier device, you use transient absorbers. No, the original designer didn't give a heck about it. No snubbers, no TVS, no nothing.
6. And the best part. The system is so vulnerable that any external EMI knocks it out. We were not even able to get a scope in the control chassis without disturbing it. We ended up having to bring in a battery powered, EMI optimized, high speed data logger to capture waveforms.

And the bonus point, it is still running, though the authority has given them a specified deadline to fix everything.

People with rediculous solid state rubbish are always oblivious to the simplest solutions... ::)

*BZZZZZZAAAAAP*
Voltamort strikes again!
Explodingus - someone who frequently causes accidental explosions
 

Offline windsmurf

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • !
  • Posts: 625
  • Country: us
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #318 on: May 17, 2019, 07:58:09 pm »
Measuring a backwards printed capacitor.
 

Offline Bud

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7025
  • Country: ca
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #319 on: May 17, 2019, 09:12:49 pm »
The 50V cap is generating a lot of voltage, 220 AC.  :-+  This is what flux capacitors do !
Facebook-free life and Rigol-free shack.
 

Offline Cyberdragon

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2676
  • Country: us
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #320 on: May 18, 2019, 05:30:12 am »
And wrapping the leads around the probes. Plan on soldering it there? (while holding the hot end of course) ;D So much wrong...
*BZZZZZZAAAAAP*
Voltamort strikes again!
Explodingus - someone who frequently causes accidental explosions
 

Offline bitwelder

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 970
  • Country: fi
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #321 on: May 18, 2019, 06:28:04 am »
Thanks to the Wider measurement range you can even find when the battery is at 0.00 V!
How can you live without it...
 

Offline Cyberdragon

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2676
  • Country: us
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #322 on: May 18, 2019, 02:02:09 pm »
but...that is 0.000 volts...
*BZZZZZZAAAAAP*
Voltamort strikes again!
Explodingus - someone who frequently causes accidental explosions
 

Offline bsfeechannel

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1667
  • Country: 00
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #323 on: May 19, 2019, 12:14:56 am »
I always find it difficult to install through-hole components on surface-mount pads.

 
The following users thanked this post: xrunner, tooki, Naguissa

Offline Cubdriver

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 4201
  • Country: us
  • Nixie addict
    • Photos of electronic gear
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #324 on: May 19, 2019, 05:21:47 am »
I always find it difficult to install through-hole components on surface-mount pads.



Try hitting them with a bigger hammer to drive the pins in.

At
If it jams, force it.  If it breaks, you needed a new one anyway...
 
The following users thanked this post: tooki


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf