Author Topic: Starship SN9 flight test in < 30 minutes (disclaimer here)  (Read 1107 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mrflibbleTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2051
  • Country: nl
Starship SN9 flight test in < 30 minutes (disclaimer here)
« on: February 02, 2021, 07:33:41 pm »
For those interested:
https://youtu.be/wfHqbahPKpY

 
The following users thanked this post: wraper, Gyro

Online wraper

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 17285
  • Country: lv
Re: Starship SN9 flight test in < 30 minutes (disclaimer here)
« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2021, 07:42:08 pm »
Also from another "spy".

 

Online wraper

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 17285
  • Country: lv
Re: Starship SN9 10km flight test LIVE 3 minutes until launch.
« Reply #2 on: February 02, 2021, 08:21:52 pm »
 

Online wraper

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 17285
  • Country: lv
Re: Starship SN9 flight test in < 30 minutes (disclaimer here)
« Reply #3 on: February 02, 2021, 08:32:52 pm »
RUD
 

Offline Sal Ammoniac

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1741
  • Country: us
Re: Starship SN9 flight test in < 30 minutes (disclaimer here)
« Reply #4 on: February 02, 2021, 08:34:52 pm »
Crash and burn!
"That's not even wrong" -- Wolfgang Pauli
 

Offline tom66

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6815
  • Country: gb
  • Electronics Hobbyist & FPGA/Embedded Systems EE
Re: Starship SN9 flight test in < 30 minutes (disclaimer here)
« Reply #5 on: February 02, 2021, 08:48:26 pm »
Looks like only one engine lit, one tried to start but quickly extinguished. Insufficient thrust and an unscheduled disassembly follows.
 

Offline Gyro

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9742
  • Country: gb
Re: Starship SN9 flight test in < 30 minutes (disclaimer here)
« Reply #6 on: February 02, 2021, 08:49:43 pm »
At least it didn't land on SN10.  :D
« Last Edit: February 02, 2021, 10:49:19 pm by Gyro »
Best Regards, Chris
 

Offline Neilm

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1551
  • Country: gb
Re: Starship SN9 flight test in < 30 minutes (disclaimer here)
« Reply #7 on: February 03, 2021, 06:56:49 pm »
What gets me is that it looks as if it over rotated, where as SN8 was vertical at h=0
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tesla referral code https://ts.la/neil53539
 

Offline raptor1956

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 869
  • Country: us
Re: Starship SN9 flight test in < 30 minutes (disclaimer here)
« Reply #8 on: February 04, 2021, 01:25:42 am »
Not only did one engine not light fully there appears to be a couple pieces fly off from the bottom.  Interesting that Elon has not responded about SN9 as he did almost immediately after SN8.  Given the high energy of the crash and the proximity of SN10 it would highly surprise me if SN10 wasn't damaged.  The damage may be minor and fixable but it could be worse -- that's the risk you take when you try to land so close to critical items.  The thing I am truly impressed by is the precision of the navigation as both SN8 and SN9 crash on the landing pad.


Brian
 

Offline TerraHertz

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3958
  • Country: au
  • Why shouldn't we question everything?
    • It's not really a Blog
Re: Starship SN9 flight test in < 30 minutes (disclaimer here)
« Reply #9 on: February 05, 2021, 05:06:33 am »
Maybe it might be a good idea to flip it to vertical a couple of seconds earlier, and let the fuel settle in the tanks and pipework before trying to light all the engines?

Setting up the next ready ship on a pad so close by the test landing impact point, does seem a bit overconfident.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2021, 05:10:44 am by TerraHertz »
Collecting old scopes, logic analyzers, and unfinished projects. http://everist.org
 

Offline Neilm

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1551
  • Country: gb
Re: Starship SN9 flight test in < 30 minutes (disclaimer here)
« Reply #10 on: February 05, 2021, 05:52:45 pm »
Maybe it might be a good idea to flip it to vertical a couple of seconds earlier, and let the fuel settle in the tanks and pipework before trying to light all the engines?

Setting up the next ready ship on a pad so close by the test landing impact point, does seem a bit overconfident.
The fuel is under a lot of presure in the tanks. Current speculation I have heard is that it was caused by an igniter issue. Raptor uses igniters (basically arc welders) rather than TEATEB and they have proved to be tricky to get working. I believe there are three, one in the main engine and one in each of the preburners that drive the pumps. Several static fire attempts have aborted due to them not working correctly.
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tesla referral code https://ts.la/neil53539
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf