Author Topic: software for work - they might be getting serious  (Read 5555 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SimonTopic starter

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 18009
  • Country: gb
  • Did that just blow up? No? might work after all !!
    • Simon's Electronics
software for work - they might be getting serious
« on: October 30, 2012, 01:12:30 pm »
So after just dropping on my lap as though nothing was an air conditioning unit ECU design they have now decided to get serious about electronics now that they have me to "use"

So I pointed out that they need to consider software and the way information is documented (trying to put a BOM onto an "item list" designed for radiator packs is "interesting"). Well I'm quite happy with kicad, it has it's little quirks but I'm familiar with that. But is there any "professional" packages that don't cost the earth that are really worth my while ?
 

Offline Majorstrain

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 49
Re: software for work - they might be getting serious
« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2012, 01:31:16 pm »
You might look at DesignSpark 4.0. http://www.designspark.com/
Its free for commercial use and it takes in Eagle libraries as well
Be aware that it is "powered by" RS Components and you do have to register it.
Cheers,
Phil
 

Offline SimonTopic starter

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 18009
  • Country: gb
  • Did that just blow up? No? might work after all !!
    • Simon's Electronics
Re: software for work - they might be getting serious
« Reply #2 on: October 30, 2012, 01:41:58 pm »
I take it that it has vastly improved since it's bumpy launch.
 

Offline SimonTopic starter

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 18009
  • Country: gb
  • Did that just blow up? No? might work after all !!
    • Simon's Electronics
Re: software for work - they might be getting serious
« Reply #3 on: October 30, 2012, 01:45:26 pm »
can design spark do autorouting ?
 

Online tom66

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6951
  • Country: gb
  • Electronics Hobbyist & FPGA/Embedded Systems EE
Re: software for work - they might be getting serious
« Reply #4 on: October 30, 2012, 01:46:27 pm »
Do not use an autorouter for anything short of a 1400 pin BGA package. Even then it's better manually routed.
 

Offline SimonTopic starter

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 18009
  • Country: gb
  • Did that just blow up? No? might work after all !!
    • Simon's Electronics
Re: software for work - they might be getting serious
« Reply #5 on: October 30, 2012, 01:49:22 pm »
for the simple slow stuff I'll be doing autorouting won't be a problem. I generally do "interactive auto routing", i will position my main parts as they need positioning and lay down any large power tracks, then let the autorouter have its way, then I look at the way it has routed and see if I can optimise my parts placement, i do any part move arounds and rerun the autorouter, I'll keep doing that until I'm happy, make a 5 hour job a 30 minute one.
 

Offline digsys

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2209
  • Country: au
    • DIGSYS
Re: software for work - they might be getting serious
« Reply #6 on: October 30, 2012, 01:56:51 pm »
I've used Proteus (www.labcenter.com) since V1 (app 20 yrs). Extremely easy to use and powerful. All the auto features if you like.
Also had to use most the others for customer projects, but never found one I like better.
Hello <tap> <tap> .. is this thing on?
 

Offline PuterGeek

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 88
  • Country: us
    • SolutionsPLUS engineering
Re: software for work - they might be getting serious
« Reply #7 on: October 30, 2012, 07:36:43 pm »
But is there any "professional" packages that don't cost the earth that are really worth my while ?

It depends on your definition of high cost.

Altium Designer is good software but they are pushing it as subscription software and trying desperately to force you into that model. They also aren't focusing much on the PCB side so new features are mostly FPGA or the like.

DIPtrace is reasonably priced and works fairly well.

I wouldn't recommend Autotrax DEX or Eagle.

I don't have any experience with the Cadance or Mentor offerings but for the price one would hope they work well.

Hope that helps.
 

Offline SimonTopic starter

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 18009
  • Country: gb
  • Did that just blow up? No? might work after all !!
    • Simon's Electronics
Re: software for work - they might be getting serious
« Reply #8 on: October 30, 2012, 07:39:08 pm »
They are not interested in the likes of altium, they don't want to spend that much and we won't be touching FPGA, pics and coic packages are the most complex we will ever go. I think i'll stick with KiCAD for now.
 

Offline Kremmen

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1289
  • Country: fi
Re: software for work - they might be getting serious
« Reply #9 on: October 30, 2012, 08:15:40 pm »
I freely admit to not being impartial, but one more vote to Diptrace from me. Not only has it managed to do everything i have really needed, but the Novarm guys keep actively developing it and listen to their customers, as witnessed by the discussions also here in eevblog forum.
Pricewise much more reasonable compared to the high end packages and while it lacks some of the high end features, nothing critical is missing as far as i have noted. At least i have managed to create several medium complex boards without difficulties (like ~500 pads, ~200 holes, vias and nets). Diptrace of course can do a lot bigger.
Nothing sings like a kilovolt.
Dr W. Bishop
 

Offline sacherjj

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 993
  • Country: us
Re: software for work - they might be getting serious
« Reply #10 on: October 30, 2012, 08:22:08 pm »
If the company is willing to buy any level of Diptrace that will do everything you need, I would jump, run, push, shove, and do anything else needed to make that happen.  It is SO much easier to use.
 

Offline SimonTopic starter

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 18009
  • Country: gb
  • Did that just blow up? No? might work after all !!
    • Simon's Electronics
Re: software for work - they might be getting serious
« Reply #11 on: October 30, 2012, 08:24:20 pm »
hm, I'll take a look, i did dable but stuck with kicad
 

Offline djsb

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 947
  • Country: gb
Re: software for work - they might be getting serious
« Reply #12 on: October 30, 2012, 10:15:16 pm »
Also don't forget that Kicad can be used with the excellent Freeroute autorouter as well. I do ALL my boards using this Autorouter now and then tweak the layout afterwards. Also python scripting and templates are on the horizon.

David.
David
Hertfordshire, UK
University Electronics Technician, London, PIC16/18, CCS PCM C, Arduino UNO, NANO,ESP32, KiCad V8+, Altium Designer 21.4.1, Alibre Design Expert 28 & FreeCAD beginner. LPKF S103,S62 PCB router Operator, Electronics instructor. Credited KiCad French to English translator
 

Offline poptones

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 709
  • Country: 00
Re: software for work - they might be getting serious
« Reply #13 on: October 30, 2012, 10:26:29 pm »
I've tried figuring out kicad, I'm still baffled by it. It seems so convoluted to me I've yet to lay out a board with it. I can't even figure out how to get the schematic to put the parts on a board... hell, I don't even see how to draw the board outline!

Perhaps not surprisingly, the easiest board layout tool I've found was one of those free board layout tools that are married to a board supplier. Problem is the format is locked away, I can't produce gerber files from it.
 

Online tom66

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6951
  • Country: gb
  • Electronics Hobbyist & FPGA/Embedded Systems EE
Re: software for work - they might be getting serious
« Reply #14 on: October 30, 2012, 10:30:55 pm »
for the simple slow stuff I'll be doing autorouting won't be a problem. I generally do "interactive auto routing", i will position my main parts as they need positioning and lay down any large power tracks, then let the autorouter have its way, then I look at the way it has routed and see if I can optimise my parts placement, i do any part move arounds and rerun the autorouter, I'll keep doing that until I'm happy, make a 5 hour job a 30 minute one.

And you will waste more time setting the darn thing up than you ever did manually routing it. 5 hours later you'll have a poorly routed board.

Also, something that has saved my bacon (multiple) times is routing out a board manually and realising "hey this isn't right", checking the schematic, checking the pin out, and then realising that I've forgotten a Vdd pin or something.
 

Offline peter.mitchell

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1567
  • Country: au
Re: software for work - they might be getting serious
« Reply #15 on: October 31, 2012, 06:29:23 am »
I have to say, as a complete beginner with PCB layout software I found DIPtrace infinitely easier than KiCad to get started and do the simple things.
 

Offline SimonTopic starter

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 18009
  • Country: gb
  • Did that just blow up? No? might work after all !!
    • Simon's Electronics
Re: software for work - they might be getting serious
« Reply #16 on: October 31, 2012, 06:41:23 am »
Also don't forget that Kicad can be used with the excellent Freeroute autorouter as well. I do ALL my boards using this Autorouter now and then tweak the layout afterwards. Also python scripting and templates are on the horizon.

David.

Yes Indeed I use that autorouter
 

Offline SimonTopic starter

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 18009
  • Country: gb
  • Did that just blow up? No? might work after all !!
    • Simon's Electronics
Re: software for work - they might be getting serious
« Reply #17 on: October 31, 2012, 06:43:53 am »
for the simple slow stuff I'll be doing autorouting won't be a problem. I generally do "interactive auto routing", i will position my main parts as they need positioning and lay down any large power tracks, then let the autorouter have its way, then I look at the way it has routed and see if I can optimise my parts placement, i do any part move arounds and rerun the autorouter, I'll keep doing that until I'm happy, make a 5 hour job a 30 minute one.

And you will waste more time setting the darn thing up than you ever did manually routing it. 5 hours later you'll have a poorly routed board.

Also, something that has saved my bacon (multiple) times is routing out a board manually and realising "hey this isn't right", checking the schematic, checking the pin out, and then realising that I've forgotten a Vdd pin or something.

Has never taken me too long so far, I don't do large boards so it takes seconds and I get a view of what is going on and can ajust positioning accordingly
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf