I'm going to be awful misogynist , male chauvinist and incorrect politically.
1.The medecine, biology , chemist, nursering ,etc all have some on common . The mayor part of the matter have to MEMORIZE. On resume ,the girls and women tend to memorize(like parrot) when they are learning.
2.The girls and women tend to be very obedient and they don't tend to dispute the stuffs. They will tend to be lambs.
3. The girls and women tend to lose the head with the babies and low-age kids and when they can't supply these wishes, they tend to work on place where there are children like kindergardens, schools and pedriatics.
All these afirmations have been recompiled of my own experiences with classroom mates (both sex ).
I'll bite.
1) You've obviously not studied medicine, biology and chemistry. They rely on a deep level of understanding, not just memory.
2) Probably true to some extent. Women do tent to be more submissive, than men and this is not a bad thing, just a difference.
3) I wouldn't agree with that. Men tend to loose their temper with the children more often, than women and are more likely to resort to corporal punishment. Women are generally more empathetic, than men, which makes them better suited to caring for younger children.
No. Wouldn't one think to ask women *why* they choose nursing over engineering and base one's conclusions at least partly upon a response from the demographic? Wouldn't *that* be smart?
Could it not be due to innate differences between the male and female genders?
Perhaps most women will select nurturing role, such as nursing, over engineering, because that's what interests them most?
If so, then why? Some may call me sexist for saying this, but don't women generally have a more nurturing role in society? Irrespective of what any government does, females will always have a greater role in childcare than males. They're designed to carry the baby for 9 months, plus nurse it for another year. It's hardly surprising they tend to select a nurturing role, over a technical one!
As someone else mentioned before, if you are interested in this stuff then go watch Jordon Petersons videos and lectures on the subject, they are fascinating, he's one of the world's leading researchers in this area. And yes, on average, innate gender differences play a huge role, if not the dominate role in this case, there is a ton of research on the topic.
But that's not the reason a lot of people want to hear.
However, be careful, Peterson has become somewhat of a poster child for this topic, and just the act of posting one of his university lectures can get you branded a misogynist for life 
I agree.
Various counterarguments to what I've said rely on social pressure and that things have changed since the stone age, but the trend is similar across cultures and basic human psychology hasn't changed since the stone age. Another problem some people will have with my comment is that it's a generalisation and shouldn't be used as an excuse for sexism, which I happen to agree with. Generally women may be less interested in engineering, but that doesn't mean they should be discouraged from a career in engineering or discriminated against, if they are interested in it.
I do think some feminists have a reason to be unhappy, with the status quo. I blame capitalism, rather than socialism. The problem is: a) society seems to value money over everything else and b) nurturing roles are typically paid less than technical ones. Perhaps both need addressing? Society needs to be less materialistic and pay nurturing roles more.
Is there sexism in society? Yes. There is a problem with unequal pay. To some extent, this may be unavoidable, as more women will take career brakes, to raise a family, than men will but even when this is taken into account, the gap persists. Look at the BBC's top paid list, as an example. They're mostly men, who get paid for doing exactly the same as their female co-stars.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-40653383
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
