Wow. I had no idea EEs were so undervalued (or is it oversupplied?) in the UK. Is this a worldwide thing?
To me, EEs are like the Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court.
Given what I read in this thread, the answer to the title is self evident. Schoolkids will follow their interests and earnings potential, holding academic effort (and loans?) constant. And it appears EE does not make the cut.
IIRC, in the 1970s USA, newly minted Chem Es were the highest pay of around $50K and EEs second at around $40K. They all got treated like princes (many engineering campuses only matriculated women starting in 1971) on interview trips and were courted with regular packages of swag. One Chem E got almost an entire pallet of Pringles from Proctor and Gamble.
Have things really soured that badly? Was it unfair to encourage the poster of "Failed Uni" to persevere? Now that I have to think about it, there was the grandson of a friend who graduated from Bucknell and left EE after two years because he could not get off the desk. His granddad and I presumed it was him, but maybe that was unfair.
IAs others noted regarding the ambiguity of the classifcation of engineers in the UK, is there the a division in EE where many create cookie cutter designs and others track more into the process? What happens when the desk EEs get displaced by AI? What will be the ripple effect all up the ladder? Is the legal profession a harbinger? Does the world need or want more EEs?
I had a friend, now gone, who was the SOSUS guy at Raytheon. Some of you may have known Gene Zelinskas. He certainly was not paid $65K.
From what I read here, if I were a "kid" who liked electronics, I would take an e tech path. Less academic effort, good pay, start earning income 2 years earlier and personal enjoyment. Or better yet, auto mechanic. Then I could put my finger to the wind in 10 years and decide how I wanted move forward from there.