Perhaps it's going to be a controversial opinion but WS et al. allow people to build prototypes and small runs where price is less critical, then join the queue for normally priced parts. But I can hear the molotovs being lit now so I'll duck out
No question but that the brokers have a legitimate role to play under current market conditions. It absolutely is a legitimate instance of capitalism in action. If you're building a $100,000 product and your line is down because of a $2 part, the ability to get them for $200 each is a godsend.
The problem is, it's not clear how we get off this ride. Manufacturers are either not building parts at all, or they're allocating everything they make to specific customers. It's hard to tell which is the case, and it doesn't matter, because either way the parts never make it to the distributor shelves. When they do, the brokers snap them up and jack up the price, which is annoying... but again, that's just a case of the goods finding their best use in the marketplace. It's like complaining about there being too many handicapped parking spots at the grocery store. If the best place in the parking lot were available, what makes you think
you'd get it?
At any rate, the manufacturers who are actually building parts are making money hand over fist. So the TI shareholders aren't about to call for Richard Templeton's head, despite the outcry here. They're laughing all the way to the proverbial bank.
The elephant in the room is that there are simply too many similar-yet-incompatible parts in too many grades and packages. Probably 5x more than the market can optimally use. Manufacturers can be expected to seize this opportunity to pare down their bloated back catalogs.
That is going to suck for the rest of us. We are probably feeling the effects already (see above), it's just that nobody is talking about it.