Property taxes are a pretty fair way of doing taxation.
Not sure I'd agree with that for a number of reasons, but that's a different discussion.
Also, if you don't pay your income taxes, or pretty much any other tax, the IRS can seize your home too. So I'm not sure your argument is really that special.
That's federal vs. state/local government. If the state/local government explicitly excludes home seizure as an option (which is the point I was making about the proposal in Idaho), that's a separate decision from what your elected officials at the federal level choose to impose upon you. We tend to get the government we deserve/allow, so if we find fault with that we should be electing different people. I note with alarm that the recidivism (um, "reelection") rate for federal politicians exceeds 90%, so we may be in the minority who actually care.
Personally, I'm in favor of a retail-only National Sales Tax to fund everything. No income taxes, no withholding taxes, nothing but a retail sales tax. Last time I saw the numbers it would take a 17% rate to match all other federal tax collection. That would be added to whatever your existing sales taxes are, over and done. The advantages are endless. It would piggyback on the existing sales tax infrastructure in almost every jurisdiction so it would be ultra-efficient. Taxes would continue to be collected at the local retailers, then filtered up the chain with each layer keeping its slice. Instead of ~200M individual income tax returns, the fedgov would collect from 50 states and a few territories. No more loopholes for rich people, illegal aliens, etc. because they buy things just like everyone else wherever they happen to be. Exempting food, shelter, and medicines (easy to do, POS systems already apply different tax rates to different things) eliminates taxation of the poor; as they work their way up the ladder and start having discretionary spending money only those new dollars are taxed so it's inherently "progressive". Perhaps most importantly, people would have no more paperwork, no more reporting, no more penalties, no more anything. Just live your life, and as you buy the things you need you help fund the services you use.
I'm not talking about a VAT, which makes everyone in the economy a tax collector for the government. The NST is the polar opposite: Individuals and most businesses would have ZERO involvement with taxes. The goal is to MINIMIZE your "responsibilities" to the government. Just live your life. April 15th is just another day. And by the way, all layers of government enjoy a steady stream of revenue rather than huge peaks and troughs at quarterly boundaries and April 15th.
Hey, a guy can dream....
EDIT: I discussed the NST with a family member who is a staffer for a Representative from California, and he pointed out another benefit I hadn't even considered. Things like "stimulus" would be exceedingly easy to implement in times of things like COVID-19. Instead of having to fire up the printing presses to issue checks, making sure the taxpayer lists are accurate, that nobody is missed, etc. they could just dial the sales tax rate up or down as needed. Implementation becomes a few hours instead of weeks or months. Since he just went through this in the last couple of years this was very much on his mind and he was VERY enthusiastic about the NST for this reason, not to mention the others.
I should have also mentioned that the last time I saw the numbers, the cumulative non-governmental cost of federal tax code compliance was $600 Billion per year. That's Billion with a "B". Imagine returning that to the economy,
every year, to do actual productive things.