I guess I don't know exactly how to refer to the sort of 'Meta-data' or neutral technique, for analyzing communication. But in this thread, for example, readers might note a bit in the hyper side, with longish, contorted 'arguments' proving this or that point...
But the point, invariably, turns out to be some stereotyped 'flaw',...of Musk, and therefore, by extension, to the whole social media thing, ...
Which is the ridiculous and seemingly partially successful 'orange man bad' psychosis or derangement.
I skip over much of the neck-straining it takes to follow those ultra-detailed arguments...rolling my eyes when reading, yet again, how some whacko in Cuba claiming 202 election fraud is a threat to my existence ? Or my democracy ? A threat to our very democracy come the cries.
Makes me wanna turn to censorship...but, no, that's just another savage attack of sarcasm.
Others, meeker than I, I'm afraid don't react with as much grace /patience.
Big bad ALEX Jones ain't gonna hurt me