The best thing he can do to that cesspool is bring it crashing to the ground and bury it for good.
This is brilliant investment advice for those who have $44B to spare.
If you can afford it and you do it for the sake of mankind, yes it IS brilliant. That place causes so much upset and stress. Screw Twitter. It's hardly a precious archived repository of valuable information.
Personally I would much rather see Musk donating to charity, rather that handing out 44B to Twitter shareholders, who were responsible for all the grievances.
Time to start a new thread about really nice chap Bezos.
Everyone and their dog has “opinions” about how the rich should handle their vast wealth. The thing is, the people with that wealth are generally more canny than the great unwashed offering “ways to use it”. I’d say someone with an EV & space industry-shifting rocket company, might just have a bit more nouse about what he’s doing than most.
The most throw-away comment in the world, and the most commented, is “you could help so many people with all that money”; usually this “advice” is offered from those for whom it would be a far MORE generous sacrifice for them to donate a good chunk of their personal wealth (from a normal income), which would show they put their money where their mouths are. When you give a good amount away and yet have a modest income, that’s FAR kinder and speaks a lot more about a person. It’s all very well commenting on “other people should do X” - who’s to say they AREN’T - the news? The “media”? People who do good are best doing it in private, lest they crow too loud and be seen as self-righteous.
I’ve no doubt Musk donates. I don’t need to “prove” in either direction, and can’t - it’s his business, and no amount of soap box “advice” will alter whether or not he does.
What others do with the funds they have been made stewards of, is none of my concern. If I see someone in need I’ll help them, because it’s the right thing to do.