Yeah, sure EV's implement more gradual power limiting, but really, a vacuum cleaner? I bet 90% of other manufacturers have no such cutout at all, or depend on stuff like 18650 PTC caps reacting at 100degC or so, then reverting back to higher than original resistance.
What is the duty cycle for a vacuum cleaner anyway? Are you really going to drive it against this thermal cutoff many times every day? I mean, even if you hit the limit say once a week in a more thorough cleaning, you would accumulate like 15 minutes * 52 = 13 hours of high temperature operation in a year.
Besides, jury's still out about the claims about cells degrading that significantly faster at 70degC. I have personally tested at 60degC and of course the capacitance fade and DC ESR rise increases manyfolds compared to room temperature but those tests still had to be run for months straight to see any degradation, how much do you think accumulated high temperature damage is a vacuum cleaner going to see?
Besides, high temperature damage is mostly combination of high temperature and high SoC, which does not happen on discharge cycle. The key question is how quick you allow charging before cooldown. And seeing the limit is 40degC here sounds quite conservative, it's close to charge temperature sweet spot (colder is worse, too).
Much more detrimental than short peaks of high discharge temperatures are long sustained (means, months of accumulated time, not minutes) temperatures, and high charge currents near 100% SoC or at temperature too low/high.
To me as a battery system designer the choice of these limits sound like they would prevent any serious degradative use pattern and transition it into poor user experience (I would hate it cutting off while I'm trying to clean). But does it trigger often in real life, that's the key question?