Bob Carver is probably one of the most famous anti-audiophiles.
Is that one of his subwoover drivers with a tracking switched power supply? Audiophiles only use space heaters.
Yes it is.
As for the 2700 Watt claim, well, ... it depends on how you want to look at it. The driver has a certain impedance, and the amp is capable of continuously driving a voltage into that driver that will calculate out to 2700 W if you use good old ohm's law. But it isn't that simple. His design uses a high back-EMF driver; basically the speaker in this sub acts like a motor that is not "stalled" which is in stark contrast to other speakers, which generally look like a stalled motor. This speaker produces a high back-EMF which cancels out a significant portion of the applied voltage, and therefore greatly reduces the actual power consumption and greatly improving efficiency. In other words, the "apparent power" through the speaker might be 2700W, but most of that is reactive power, not real power. The spec sheet BS numbers use the audio industries nonsensical way of calculating power (P=V
2/R), but it is in line with how everyone else does it. He (Bob Carver) is very forward about the fact that the 2700 W number is both 'real' and sort of nonsense. Read the old white papers about the design of the amplifier and the driver and cabinet. This little sub went impossibly loud and low for its small 1 cu.ft. size two decades ago. This subwoofer re-defined the physics of how to produce bass by being simultaneously loud, deep, small, and efficient - a previously impossible combination. Clearly, I am impressed by the technology. I have nothing to say about how it sounds, which is a rather important trait in audio gear.
p.s. Too bad about the new ownership of the company as mentioned above.
p.p.s. This is a mkII which is very old, so clearly not made by the company's new Chinese overlords - not a "B.S. Chinese plate amp".