I don't have faith in science, I don't believe in science. I accept that it is the best system our species has come up with to advance our understanding of the real world. I accept evidence which describe facts. I accept nothing without proper evidence.
respectfully, it is you that playing with word i think. by definition....
Faith is defined as belief, confidence or trust in a person, object, religion, idea or view despite the absence of proof.
i call that (and maybe we accepted it as) "blind faith" to be precise, and thats stupid... maybe we have misunderstanding here as english is not my first language, but i dont know what to describe what i'm trying to say, maybe its called "motivation", motivation is what drives us. or maybe a saying "i accepted that.." can be the same meaning as "i believe that as a truth of thing" - just because "i've seen it" or "experienced the proof or truth" of it.
Mechatrommer is our resident fruitloop.
"Be excellent to each other. That means no personal attacks."
David L. Jones, EEVBLOG forum rules.
and there is no point of being offended no matter how people attack you. i/we should accept it as they just dont know it yet.... we feel sorry and we care, thats why we keep helping each other... regardless of what will come back at you
and frankly laymen speaking, i dont really understand what "fruitloop" is. hurt my brain try to translate it programmatically. you should read some aristotle or descartes book/writing, will hurt your brain i bet, i dont blame it, thats how we got educated to interact with our tangible surrounding world.
saying "i dont believe its true" and saying "i believe its not true" can be 2 different syntaxes of the same semantics, so does "i accepted" or "i do not accepted" i think... fwiw.