My highly subjective impression is that the Fluke meters seem more "solid" and "professional" than the Aglient.
I love the OLED display model, but if I could afford only one meter, that wouldn't be it - in fact, I wouldn't own one at all if it weren't for Grainger's sale.
If I could have only one meter, for my use, I would choose a used 189 or 187. (or the strangely named 87-IV) More resolution* than the 87-5, which is advertised as an "industrial meter," despite being very useful as a "go to" all purpose electronics meter - as Dave will testify. Also, the dual display comes in handy. (Yes, the Agilent has that, too)
If I had two meters, they would be a 87-V and a 189. For three, I'd add a 287 or 289, and maybe a used 70 series or 27 type for a "knock around, throw it in the back of the truck" meter.
Your decisions may be different, but my point is Fluke has the variety, as well as the support and longevity. I don't see a 10 year old Agilent being a viable option - but I have 20 and almost 30 year old Fluke meters that I'd trust in a second. Many are available for a song used, and they keep their calibrations. Yes, you have to weed out the obviously wrecked ones, but I've bought hideous, beat-up Flukes that are still accurate to specs. I don't get the impression that these Agilents can take it as well.
As Kiriakos has said, however, time will tell. I may be proven wrong.
(* 87-5 6000 count in standard mode, 20000 count in slower, hi-res mode. 18x - 50,000 count. Yes, I know that's not much difference and as I explained, this is my preference only. I can't and won't argue with anyone that says the 87-5 is a better choice.)
If I had 153+ meters, I'd have several 27's, a few 10 series, a few 70-III, a couple of 179s, maybe a 112, several 70 series, a few 80 series, three 18x meters, two 287, and maybe an LCD and OLED Agilent.