Author Topic: Computer for Apollo  (Read 9411 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline atferrariTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 314
  • Country: ar
Computer for Apollo
« on: February 22, 2015, 12:23:05 pm »
I run across this video

http://youtu.be/YIBhPsyYCiM

I got surprised to learn that still there they used a sextant to measure angles between Earth and starts but looking at the date, no surprise.

Incredible the hard work they did to solve one by one all the steps to build such a computer. Wiring the memories...!  :palm:

Starting at around minute 6, the panel of the computer is shown. There are two words "verb" and "noun". Does anyone could tell what they actually mean in this context?
Agustín Tomás
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, however, there is.
 

Offline John Coloccia

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1217
  • Country: us
Re: Computer for Apollo
« Reply #1 on: February 22, 2015, 12:46:24 pm »
The "verb" is the command, and the "noun" is a parameter for the command.  I don't know much about the Apollo computer, but just as a made up example, let's say you want to recall the last recorded position.  Perhaps you might enter a command like this:

verb: Display
noun: Last Position

Maybe you want to see time of flight.

verb: Display
noun: time of flight

Again, I'm just making it up, but that's basically how it used to work.
 

Offline Mechanical Menace

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1288
  • Country: gb
Re: Computer for Apollo
« Reply #2 on: February 22, 2015, 12:59:58 pm »
The sextant was hardly your "olde fashioned" affair, even if they do still have them as backups nowadays.

Just looking at the pic I'd love to get my hands on a modern equivalent.
« Last Edit: February 22, 2015, 01:01:45 pm by Mechanical Menace »
Second sexiest ugly bloke on the forum.
"Don't believe every quote you read on the internet, because I totally didn't say that."
~Albert Einstein
 

Offline atferrariTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 314
  • Country: ar
Re: Computer for Apollo
« Reply #3 on: February 22, 2015, 01:31:46 pm »
The sextant was hardly your "olde fashioned" affair, even if they do still have them as backups nowadays.

Just looking at the pic I'd love to get my hands on a modern equivalent.

By that time I used them every day on board and I did so, long after the satellites were installed in our vessels. My last voyage using it intensively was from Philippines all the way down to Argentina doing the morning / evening calculations with stars.

Since practice makes for perfection I started to compete with myself to see how many fixes (of different starts or even planets) I could take in one period until the horizon did not allow for more. My record, 14.

The one in the picture, is it for aeronautical use? I do not recognize much in it. Is it complete? Any link?
Agustín Tomás
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, however, there is.
 

Offline atferrariTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 314
  • Country: ar
Re: Computer for Apollo
« Reply #4 on: February 22, 2015, 01:34:55 pm »
The "verb" is the command, and the "noun" is a parameter for the command.  I don't know much about the Apollo computer, but just as a made up example, let's say you want to recall the last recorded position.  Perhaps you might enter a command like this:

verb: Display
noun: Last Position

Maybe you want to see time of flight.

verb: Display
noun: time of flight

Again, I'm just making it up, but that's basically how it used to work.

Gracias for replying. It makes sense now.  :-+
Agustín Tomás
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, however, there is.
 

Offline Mechanical Menace

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1288
  • Country: gb
Re: Computer for Apollo
« Reply #5 on: February 22, 2015, 01:47:51 pm »
The one in the picture, is it for aeronautical use? I do not recognize much in it. Is it complete? Any link?

That's the sextant used for the Apollo missions, through the sound of things to compensate for errors in the inertial guidance system.

http://www.ion.org/museum/item_view.cfm?cid=6&scid=5&iid=293

Second sexiest ugly bloke on the forum.
"Don't believe every quote you read on the internet, because I totally didn't say that."
~Albert Einstein
 

Offline atferrariTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 314
  • Country: ar
Re: Computer for Apollo
« Reply #6 on: February 22, 2015, 01:56:43 pm »
The one in the picture, is it for aeronautical use? I do not recognize much in it. Is it complete? Any link?

That's the sextant used for the Apollo missions, through the sound of things to compensate for errors in the inertial guidance system.

http://www.ion.org/museum/item_view.cfm?cid=6&scid=5&iid=293

Interesting site.

Gracias MM  :-+
Agustín Tomás
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, however, there is.
 

Offline amyk

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8417
Re: Computer for Apollo
« Reply #7 on: February 22, 2015, 04:05:53 pm »
Schematics: http://klabs.org/history/ech/agc_schematics/

Imagine designing a whole computer with nothing but 3-input NOR gates...
 

Offline Mechanical Menace

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1288
  • Country: gb
Re: Computer for Apollo
« Reply #8 on: February 22, 2015, 04:35:03 pm »
Schematics: http://klabs.org/history/ech/agc_schematics/

Imagine designing a whole computer with nothing but 3-input NOR gates...

Interesting site, thanks for sharing.

I am wondering why they went for 3 input NOR gates instead of 2 input NOR or NAND gates? Will have to get reading.
Second sexiest ugly bloke on the forum.
"Don't believe every quote you read on the internet, because I totally didn't say that."
~Albert Einstein
 

Offline SeanB

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16366
  • Country: za
Re: Computer for Apollo
« Reply #9 on: February 22, 2015, 04:58:33 pm »
They probably wanted more logic elements, but a 3 input gate is useful and can be used to make any other gate easily. As well you only need 2 to make a RS flip flop, with the extra gate providing a nice clear function for it. As that was likely the most reliable IC that you could make at the time with 3 transistors on it, and used identical value resistors throughout with at least good tolerance for production spread this was probably a big deciding factor.
 

Offline Mechanical Menace

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1288
  • Country: gb
Re: Computer for Apollo
« Reply #10 on: February 22, 2015, 06:10:15 pm »
but a 3 input gate is useful and can be used to make any other gate easily.

Didn't think of that one, less wasted transistors than hooking up loads of 2 input gates...
Second sexiest ugly bloke on the forum.
"Don't believe every quote you read on the internet, because I totally didn't say that."
~Albert Einstein
 

Offline albert22

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 177
Re: Computer for Apollo
« Reply #11 on: February 22, 2015, 06:26:55 pm »
Thanks for the very interesting links posted. Definitely the choice of only one IC type was made for reliability.
A very important purpose for the sextant was to align the inertial platform to several coordinate systems. This allowed the computer to point the apollo and fire the rockets to the exact trajectory. The computer calculated the position by using  stars and relevant point in the earth. But it was more accurately determined from the earth by several tracking stations and by measuring the delay and phase of the radio signals travelling from earth to the spacecraft and back to earth. I read that in this way the error was just a couple of meters when they were near the moon.
 

Offline Mechanical Menace

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1288
  • Country: gb
Re: Computer for Apollo
« Reply #12 on: February 22, 2015, 06:39:35 pm »
I read that in this way the error was just a couple of meters when they were near the moon.

370,000,000 metersish and only out by a couple when they got there? Technology has come a long way since the 60's and they managed that and yet we can't even get out of LEO nowadays :wtf:
Second sexiest ugly bloke on the forum.
"Don't believe every quote you read on the internet, because I totally didn't say that."
~Albert Einstein
 

Offline atferrariTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 314
  • Country: ar
Re: Computer for Apollo
« Reply #13 on: February 24, 2015, 03:52:41 pm »
The one in the picture, is it for aeronautical use? I do not recognize much in it. Is it complete? Any link?

That's the sextant used for the Apollo missions, through the sound of things to compensate for errors in the inertial guidance system.

http://www.ion.org/museum/item_view.cfm?cid=6&scid=5&iid=293

Digging deeper and wider I came to more info here

http://timeandnavigation.si.edu/artifacts/search?field_topic_tid=3

Impressive.



Agustín Tomás
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, however, there is.
 

Offline free_electron

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8550
  • Country: us
    • SiliconValleyGarage
Re: Computer for Apollo
« Reply #14 on: February 24, 2015, 03:55:56 pm »
Schematics: http://klabs.org/history/ech/agc_schematics/

Imagine designing a whole computer with nothing but 3-input NOR gates...
More TTL , less VHDL !
Professional Electron Wrangler.
Any comments, or points of view expressed, are my own and not endorsed , induced or compensated by my employer(s).
 

Offline AdShea

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 35
Re: Computer for Apollo
« Reply #15 on: February 24, 2015, 07:46:53 pm »
RTL, not TTL. They only used pull down NPNs and resistors there (4 R + 3PNP for one gate).
 

Offline GK

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2607
  • Country: au
Re: Computer for Apollo
« Reply #16 on: February 25, 2015, 03:03:10 am »
Imagine designing a whole computer with nothing but 3-input NOR gates...



Or NAND gates which are logically equivalent depending on interpreting the IO as either positive or negative logic.

Not a particularly onerous task in either case......
 
Bzzzzt. No longer care, over this forum shit.........ZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf