Author Topic: Cat5e noise/ random failures  (Read 7726 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Monkeh

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8060
  • Country: gb
Re: Cat5e noise/ random failures
« Reply #25 on: March 20, 2016, 01:53:20 am »
It looks to me that whoever did the original install under bid the job. The cabling needs to be punched down, secured and then short patch cords used for long term reliability. Terminating with a RJ45 directly into the service gear will be problematic long term.

Now that makes no sense why would you add another failure point of a patch pannel.

How many call backs have you had on a 110 IDC within an IDF assuming the cabling was tested? Zero?

... but there's nothing to terminate.
 

Offline DimitriP

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1384
  • Country: us
  • "Best practices" are best not practiced.© Dimitri
Re: Cat5e noise/ random failures
« Reply #26 on: March 20, 2016, 02:26:48 am »
When it doubt, recrimp.

As for supporting the cables,  a zip tie supporting a velcro strip wrapped around each pair of cables on each server will take care of it.
   If three 100  Ohm resistors are connected in parallel, and in series with a 200 Ohm resistor, how many resistors do you have? 
 

Offline kingofkyaTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 143
  • Country: us
Re: Cat5e noise/ random failures
« Reply #27 on: March 20, 2016, 03:00:58 am »
It looks to me that whoever did the original install under bid the job. The cabling needs to be punched down, secured and then short patch cords used for long term reliability. Terminating with a RJ45 directly into the service gear will be problematic long term.

Now that makes no sense why would you add another failure point of a patch pannel.

How many call backs have you had on a 110 IDC within an IDF assuming the cabling was tested? Zero?

quite a few that were put in by the datacenter operators, but thats besides the point.  Why would you add another connection/failure point.
 

Offline blacksheeplogic

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 532
  • Country: nz
Re: Cat5e noise/ random failures
« Reply #28 on: March 20, 2016, 04:00:43 am »
quite a few that were put in by the datacenter operators, but thats besides the point.  Why would you add another connection/failure point.

Because they are highly reliable compared to long cables with RJ45 connectors. If there's a problem with the patch connection, it's easy to replace, the short patch cords are less troublesome and cheap to replace.

I realize some clients under invest. I've seen environments where unlabeled cables dropped down from the racks and disappeared under the raised floor.

 

Online Monkeh

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8060
  • Country: gb
Re: Cat5e noise/ random failures
« Reply #29 on: March 20, 2016, 04:14:02 am »
quite a few that were put in by the datacenter operators, but thats besides the point.  Why would you add another connection/failure point.

Because they are highly reliable compared to long cables with RJ45 connectors. If there's a problem with the patch connection, it's easy to replace, the short patch cords are less troublesome and cheap to replace.

I realize some clients under invest. I've seen environments where unlabeled cables dropped down from the racks and disappeared under the raised floor.

There are no long cables!

Switch. Same rack. Patch cables.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf