@Macbeth Are you serious? You must be kidding. Please put some video of it
@Kalvin Oh yeah, that's great. What kind of drugs do you use?
@McBryce
How much for an app that does that and is given to you by a very hot EE woman that loves you?
@TomC
I have an old 2nd edition that a british oldie geek gave me too, it's nice stuff but a bit outdated.
I can afford the damn book with some effort,. I plan to buy it if getting it cheaper, and even more if there's a errata fixed version along with "Learning..." if the new version gets really revised and pedagogically good for fools like me (bad at maths, physics, memory, etc).
I can't afford to wear that giant ebook. I have a laptop and an ereader to avoid a lot of weight and deadtrees.
If those efforts true, I admire it and it's kind of sad others aren't able to enjoy it. But it's a shame in 2015 they didn't consider to make a digital release. If they're scared about piracy, that's going to happen even if they only release it in stones.
With the digital edition, they could use Epub3 (embed vectorial images, videos, datasheets, hires images, etc). They could add the removed chapters and even pay for updates, not just erratas but really interesting ones. This way it will be a live book, instead need to wait for a new edition. We're in a digital world on top of an analog one, but digital makes very easy to do iterative improvements. Please don't use propietary crap and go to the Epub3 standard, Oxford University Press loves it and it's a shit to use it on alternate platforms.
@Paul Horowitz
Congratulations for your book. I hope to see a book for fools like me that are bad at maths and such. I would love to learn all the necessary stuff, but finding books and a proper foolproof methodology makes is very difficult for me.
I know you must stay neutral and this book is owned by a giant publisher, so not going to put you in a compromise. Just read it, don't give your opinion: I cried a bit when knew about how even technical labor in books is externalized to countries with lower wages. There's lots of unemployed geeks out there that would love to make that, and the review process would be extreme.
April 2016? Why taking so long? Even a bunch of "nuts" did their own version