Sorry, I think my posts have been taken too literally.
Before Patreon there was PayPal. Without significant data I assume, from a subscriber base, more have switched to the former. People think they are getting more for their money with Patreon.
Before YouTube Red there was plain YouTube. Take a guess why the content producers on 'plain' YouTube are earning less.
All advertisement revenue works in cycles. Historically, an average platform content producer (music, TV, newspaper, internet) earned less per content viewer, as the platform matured and competition stiffened up.
Patreon is still an outlier, but as soon as corporate marketing comes into play and 'packages' are introduced, as well as competition arrives, people will decide more carefully where their money is spent. Or they will just go for a package that promises '20%+ savings' and 'fair share'.
Sorry, I may have been in this marketing whirlwind to understand that I'm making a wrong prediction. But at least I know, that in the end, people will always choose cost saving if they are promised better value. The packaged deals work as well, or even better, than bold thumbnail titles. That was the point I was trying to make. Corporations love packages as much as they love swallowing smaller businesses.
PS: regarding AvE, I was under the impression that all the promising projects are under the Patreon paywall. Like the EDM machine. ElectroBoom has the expensive giveaways only to patreons. TSP did something similar and was quite scolded. On the other side, there are always people that buy something from Amazon just for the vacation, only to return it used and in a terrible condition. The same with some viewers, they always demand more for their 'money'.