I'd say the EXIF looks legit... woulld be too correct for what we can expect from them
I grudgingly agree.
A "positive" result doesn't prove anything either way though. They could be setting up for manufacturing, they could have pulled some old prototypes out of a closet and photographed them last month.
We need a "negative" result.
The camera used is slightly weird (most people these days would use a cellphone) but that doesn't prove anything.
The only thing that really bothers me is the name "Batteriser" in those pics. They have the Energiser lawsuit hanging over them and a couple of months ago they changed the spelling on the prototypes they were showing (I can't find the pics of that, anybody remember where they are...?)