Pretty okay test, not too bad, except for the same awful narrator. Now: key question. How long would that same Kodak camera go for in the same test with eneloop pros powering it (no batteroos obviously)?
I already suggested that the FZ43 which Amazon show as a newer and cheaper version of the FZ41 be tested with AA batteriseroo sleeves.
A Walmart listing for it says :
Photo shooting - 120 shots ( alkaline batteries )
Photo shooting - 360 shots ( NiMH batteries )
That indicates it is intended for use with NiMH batteries and won't have a ridiculously high cut off voltage (which is what I exepect the Vivitar crap they tested has).
It obviously hammers batteries resulting in poor life from alkalines, but, with batteriseroo sleeves it is going to hammer them even more. I am really doubtful that batteriseroo sleeves are going to increase life in this camera and am much more suspicious of foul play, like the left camera was recording 720p and the right 320x240. Why did they switch from photo with flash in the Vivitar test to video recording in this one?
Also the cameras are numbered #3 and #2. How many cameras did they have and why? If they are supposed to be identical why did they need numbering?
My suggestion that AA sleeves need to be tested in a FZ43 and now FZ41 is still I think a good one.