0 Members and 17 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Blocco on December 16, 2016, 10:37:10 amThe musings of a fool..... Just about every assertion in the Batteroo patent is wrong....[0035]If one looks at the potential return of such a device in terms of lifetime of a battery, one can see significant benefits. For instance, the AA battery in the above example would use roughly the equivalent charge of the battery output in the range of 1.5V to 1.4V. This means that after 0.1V drop, the battery's life is over. If the battery could be used until its voltage reaches 0.8V, then after 0.7V drop the battery's life is over. To have that in your patent application is embarrassing enough if you are just some hack "inventor" with little knowledge of batteries or electronic product design. But to be two major players in the electronics industry, CEO of tech companies in the power/charger industry no less, PhD's, university professor, hundreds of patents to your name, etc etc as they boast, it's beyond embarrassing The problem with the patent for them is that it's there forever now, they can't take it back, they can't change it like they do their website, and it shows exactly what they based their entire product and business model on.Everything after the patent is them trying to scramble to save face with their idea and claims.
The musings of a fool..... Just about every assertion in the Batteroo patent is wrong....[0035]If one looks at the potential return of such a device in terms of lifetime of a battery, one can see significant benefits. For instance, the AA battery in the above example would use roughly the equivalent charge of the battery output in the range of 1.5V to 1.4V. This means that after 0.1V drop, the battery's life is over. If the battery could be used until its voltage reaches 0.8V, then after 0.7V drop the battery's life is over.
Get a sleeve to someone who can decap the IC and take high res microscope pictures!
I just got my Christmas present, and I thought I have to share it with you.
Here you go
Random Youtube Video.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyZw1PSyQkE&feature=youtu.be&t=300People who are in to watch gadgets should probably go to the start of the video, the concept appears pretty flash but broad day light could be a problem and strangely I don't see any finger shadowing effect or obscuration, now that's very interesting.
Quote from: razvanme on December 16, 2016, 02:42:55 pmHere you goOh, did anyone also notice the false declaration? They send it as a "gift", which is, at least here in germany, a big problem if it actually isn't a gift and instead a paid article. Since they were paid, customs could potentially get a bit angry about this?
I have no attachments to the sleeves, so you decide what I should do with them. Except the ones that reach Dave, I have 4 more to send, so you decide. I've just sent them an email.
Oh, did anyone also notice the false declaration? They send it as a "gift", which is, at least here in germany, a big problem if it actually isn't a gift and instead a paid article. Since they were paid, customs could potentially get a bit angry about this?
http://zeptobars.com/en/ would be a good choice.
I have sent an email to zeptobars for decaping, so depending on the answer I will give them two samples. So the count is 4 to Dave and 2 to FrankBuss. Possibly 2 to for decaping. 8 in total. I know a lot of you want to test them, however I only have 8
No, you read the document wrong: The x arks it as Commercial Sample. To mark it as Gift the mark would be on the left side of the field "Gift". Or where would you put the mark for Commercial Sample?
Thanks. I can forward them to anybody who wants them after my tests.
Maybe it's time to start a separate "Batteroo testing" thread.