Same reply I gave to your same comment on Youtube:
Yes, i did. It was Tekway oscilloscope first impression video #487 . And then again you were comparing it to Rigol all the time, talking how much Rigol is better then this crap. Moreover you done lots of Rigol (positive) reviews before, that is why i am thinking Rigol is paying you for positive feedbacks (which is ok to me, since you have to earn money? somehow). I would glad to review Atten and Rigol PSU but i am not that rich to buy them.
OK, I'll be quite frank, there is nothing that
pisses me off more than people who claim I either being paid to give positive reviews, or have some sort of bias, when I
clearly demonstrate
time and time again that is
not the case.
I don't mind if people don't like my review and comments, that's fine if you have another view, but please base them on
facts.
Let get some facts straight. The Tekway as tested was crap, and I have video evidence to back that up. It had crap pulse response, and it had crap trigger stability for starters.
Do you
really think that an oscilloscope, an instrument that is designed to measure and
display a signal faithfully should have got a positive review? If you do, then quite frankly you are bonkers.
The result of that Tekway review? - my good mate Charles likely won't loan me anything ever again. You think I did that deliberately? I called it as I saw it.
The ATTEN PSU was crap. In fact I took some heat for giving it a barely thumbs sideways.
So I'm calling you out:
Show me the evidence where the Rigol has the same signal integrity issues as that Tekway I tested.
Show me the evidence where the ATTEN is better to use and a more professional instrument than the Rigol.
Explain why I would show and say BAD things about the Rigol if they were paying me? WHY? Answer the question.
If you can't answer those then STFU with your ridiculous claims.
Yes, I'm sick, I'm tired, and I'm cranky. You got what you deserved. I have no tolerance for people who make unsubstantiated accusations. Back them up or bugger off.