It's straight off the official university website and they were awarded the public money, they are proud partners, read the link:
It quotes Dr Tim Pelham, directly:
Dr Timothy Pelham, academic principle investigator, explained: “The concept depends upon the use of gigascale antenna arrays capable of delivering over 2GW of power from space onto similar gigascale antenna arrays either at sea or on the ground..."
Here are his details, can also be found on the official university website:
https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/persons/timothy-pelham
You've never had publicity people claiming you said things you never said? You need to get out, I mean slandered, more. People need to toe the line if they want to survive. Until I hear people freely talking in person I will hold judgement on them.
Slandered? Yes I have.
However the problem is that there's no deniability if you are asked to work on a feasibility study for something that is plainly beyond the laws of physics, and or economics, and you are clearly qualified to understand that, but because your organisation can realise a nice fat piece of public funding to '
find out' that it's not practical, do you validate it by doing the
research?
Is it legal? I don't know. Is it moral? Definitely not.
Speaking generally, if an organisation is corrupt, then it's time to get out: toeing the line within an organisation is all very well if it doesn't harm your health, integrity, or liberty. A lot of people find themselves on the wrong side of the law by 'toeing the line'.
As for judging people then I'll repeat "by association" they're happy to do the publicity.
Are you in a position to say that the university press release was inaccurate? If so why give it such a new science spin? The money was in the bag, promoting it just makes themselves look like complete mutts.
I just wish I could withhold income tax based on money that is wasted on and defrauded by this kind of wankery.
Regards
X