I am not responsible for what people write in the comments.
You are not responsible for comments on your article but you have no problem quoting old interviews of others (That too when the company was 2 month old?) and you don't see the irony in that.
You've gone from claims of "creating a cess pool" to simple "irony", nice backdown
That really had nothing to do with the meat of the video!
This video is about laughing at the (again)
demonstrably ridiculous claims of solar power blades, air-taxies that can carry people, and underwater propulsion, all with the same technology. Every engineer with any clue at all looks at this and laughs their arse off at such claims.
Again, noted that you have zero evidence for your claim of me personally attacking the founder. Care to withdraw that claim?
So tell us, where are they now?
Go on, enlighten us.
If they have newer stuff to show then it's not my fault it's not on their website.
Obviously I am not privy to where they are now and I don't expect any non web based startup to update their website with latest.
But since you were doing a review of what they do, you had the moral and ethical reason to reach out and find out.
Bullshit.
A company can live or die by the claims on their website.
If they have newer tech or demos that proves they are on the right track then they are free to post that in response. Heck I'll even link to their video, and they can join this forum and post here and explain how wonderful their technology is.
I am sure you had good intentions Dave and I definitely enjoy your content. But this is definitely not the right approach.
It's my channel and I'll do things my way. Again, the claims being made here are
demonstrably ridiculous from an engineering perspective. It's fundamentally an impractical concept like solar roadways.
I can tell you what would happen if I had contacted the company. One of three things:
1) No response
2) Some more BS pointing to existing content, boasting about the founders credentials etc.
3) "Just wait, don't make a video until you see our demo coming soon" where of course "soon" never comes, because he idea is impratical
I've been making debunking videos for a decade, I have vast experience in claims like this and how companies
never come through.
Why would they give me exclusive data they haven't revealed to the public? Even if they did, it's the
CLAIMS they are making I take issue at. They cannot provide prove of this because it's obvious this technology will not work for the claims they are making.
They can easily prove me wrong by posting demos of their technology publicly.
Again, the three things I take aim at are the solar generation, the air-taxi, and the underwater propulsion claims. There is zero evidence they have even tried these things. Their demo is just a variable pitch turbine blade, and a quite frankly piss-weak feable looking design at that, that even a non-mechanical engineer like myself can see it won't scale for basic wind operation let alone the other ridiculous claims.
You post ridiculous engineering claims and you get laughed at, that's how this works. Again, welcome to engineering.