Revolutionary! The first 4 1/2 digit multimeter with only 4 digits in the display.
I'm pretty sure you're being sarcastic here, and ha ha, but just in case someone else doesn't get it:
Incorrect photos are not unusual. The meter is actually pretty similar in specs to the (in)famous UT61E (the most notable difference to my eye is that it lacks a 2 A current range), and there are a
lot of pictures of the UT61E with the correct model name on the meter but showing the rather different display of the UT61A through D models. My guess would be that a lot of shops have a graphics guy to whom they hand photos to be cleaned up and they get "cleaned up" without much care as to which photos were actually used to assemble the final image.
In this case, looking at the images below taken from
this store's link, the first one I would guess is from a different, lower-count meter; note the lack of space for a "1" digit between the "AC" indication and the four digits and, much more damning, the lack of a secondary display or bar graph. The second image looks as if it's a correct display; there's only four digits but there is space for a presumably non-iluminated "1" digit at the left. And the third image of course shows that there is indeed a "1" digit there.
I always get nervous, though, when looking at shops displaying what is ostensibly the meter I'd be buying but with the wrong display.
This guy is $7 cheaper than
this guy for what is supposed to be, but doesn't look like, the same meter.
(And hey, since we're totally off topic at this point anyway, now that I've learned much about people feelings toward meter labeling, anybody want to discuss how the ZEAST 282 compares to the UT61E, besides the obvious lack of serial data output?)