Thanks for the comprehensive review on magnificent and innovative integration of a spectrum analyzer frequency domain along with the time domain oscilloscope functions into one instrument. I just started working on a temporary, on call, as needed HP giant Eagle Jet plotter repair technician. With all of those years stuck at school, I still do not have enough service requests to earn a good living, oh. . . The American economy collapsed and still have not gotten better. I would not need a Tektronix MDO 4104-6.
Why:
1. It is too heavy and large for me to pack it to the plotter repair place. It is light weight that it is four instruments as one.
2. It is too expensive, at $28,000.00 USD and additional $2,000.00 USD for module software plug ins, no. I am usually paid about $150.00 USD per repair. I only make about 3 to 8 repairs per year.
3. Plotters are not RF circuits, just basic switching power supply and stepper motor computers and digital signals, a basic four channel digital oscilloscope would be more than enough for around $315.00 USD from a Hong Kong store. I use a Rigol 1052E or Atten with 7 inch display, both are inexpensive and displays what I need.
4. Plotters are really mechanical intensive machines, some control and power electronics.
5. I do not think; I can be an electronics tech until retirement, because the jobs are all in Asia, not in the U.S.A. I would not invest that much into an oscilloscope. If I could earn that much money, that it would be to volcanology school for one summer.
6. Electronics has been a tiny side income, not a primary income with so much outsourcing to other countries. Electronics is a declining industry in the 2000s like the specialty garment industry was in the 1980s. The clothes industry went over seas for cheaper skilled labor.
7. The oscilloscope software have too much lag time and not instant response. It needs a more higher performance processor.
8. The USB memory device did not works at first or second try.
9. It is not clear how well it works with the PC.
Here is another way to look at the MDO 4104-6 mixed domain oscilloscope:
10. It does save bench space that it is four instruments in one. Yes, it will weigh a tad more, but it is four instruments into one and the controlling, displaying, and storage software are nicely integrated together as one.
The four threaded tapped holes in the rear of the Tektronix MDO 4104-6 are for mounting the oscilloscope onto a swivel articulating arm to save work table top or bench top space. You will not lose space on your shelf for this $28,000.00 USD mixed domain oscilloscope. The large 10.5 cm diagonal LCD display will not likely survive a drop test upon concrete floor, because the large surface area of the glass LCD display. The smaller the surface area, the more likely it will survive the drop test unbroken. The Fluke 1,2,3 industrial strength Scope meter with 20 MHz bandwidth are more likely to make it through a drop test.
I cannot afford an Agilent X. The Agilent 3062 series in the 60 MHz second hand market is all I can afford in the Agilent brand, which is similar to the Rigol 1052E series at 60 MHz. The Agilent 3062 is made in China, too.
http://www.newark.com/tektronix/mdo4104-6/oscilloscope-mixed-domain-21-chan/dp/48T2687?Ntt=TEKTRONIX+MDO+4104-6My favorite Tektronix is an older Tektronix analog 400 series for $100.00 USD. It is a tad heavy to carry. I do not think the exotic, modern oscilloscopes like the ones you reviewed are for me. I view your video as for entertainment than for practical use. The Agilent X series and the Tektronix MDO oscilloscopes are not for use everyday. It is like a Ferrari, Tesla S, or the Rinspeed Squba exotic cars. This review is not for me, more for entertainment. The MDO 4104-6 is for those who need extremely four instruments integrated into one instrument and one visual displaying tool. It does have a market, but specialized. Will it revolutionized the oscilloscope market? I doubt it, because it is not always needed by a broad customer base. The design is sure to win some innovation awards for integrating four instruments as one. I doubt it would be a common concept with all oscilloscopes in the future.
Conclusion:
Tektronix MDO 4104-6 is an innovation, not a revolution. It is definitely a new inventive concept. It is not for me.