Especially if you are planning to observe digital signals, you should consider, that the Owon does not have a built in logic analyzer. But the Hantek has a sample rate we better do not start looking at...
PS: Dave has made a video about scope grounds. You might want to watch it before choosing: http://www.eevblog.com/2012/05/18/eevblog-279-how-not-to-blow-up-your-oscilloscope/
Well, now I am confused. The hantek HAS and the owon HASN'T a logic analyzeR? Shouldn't it be suposed to be able to observe digital signals with a scope( a constant line with a certain voltage value???)
Greetings
You are right, the Hantek has a logic analyzer, whereas the Owon hasn't.
A logic analyzer is something similar to a scope, but it only can observe digital signal levels (on/off), but it has a lot of features for that, which a scope doesn't. It has for example 8 or 16 digital channels, instead of just 2. The other thing ist, that it often can decode bus signals, like I²C and SPI. That would be something you could not do easily with a scope. I think that would be quite good for you. But the downside of that scope is, that it is not isolated and that the sampling rate (basically the frequency at which the internal DAC reads the voltages in) is just about twice the frequency, which is really bad. The sampling rate should usually be 4 (better more) the bandwidth of the scope. It would only make sense to use that scope up to 12MHz (or less if you want more than 4samples/s).
You can probably exceed the bandwith limit (neglecting the sample rate), because at e.g. 20MHz the signal has just lost about 30%(-3dB) of its amplitude. But I am not an expert on this topic.
PS: I just read, that the LA is limited to 10MHz on the Hantek 6022BL and I also read Gyro's comment. So here is the seccond explanation...