Author Topic: SMD Soldering Feedback  (Read 3853 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline gsgxTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 15
  • Country: us
SMD Soldering Feedback
« on: June 11, 2023, 06:19:51 am »
Hi, I'm relatively new to soldering and very new to SMD soldering. I've been practicing soldering some SMD components, and I wanted some feedback on how to improve. Specifically, I need some confirmation I understand which joints aren't great and what to do about it. My process is to get some solder on one pad, place the component, melt the solder to get the component to stick, and then solder the other side. You can find some photos below. I'm using lead-free solder.

1803737-0

1803743-1

1803749-2


Some specific questions:
- I think the right joint of C1 is how I want the rest to look, can anyone confirm?
- I feel like too many of them are "blobby" (left side of C2 is particularly bad), is this because I'm using too much solder?
- Do any of them look like there's not enough solder? Maybe the right side of C9 and C10? I know it may be hard to tell from a top-down photo.
- Some of the joints are "pointy", like the right side of C4 and C5. It happens when I take the iron off of the pad and some of the solder gets pulled away from the pad. I'd guess this means I need more flux, or could it be something else?

EDIT: Could someone point out what I'm doing wrong with the inline image attachments?
 

Online Siwastaja

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8829
  • Country: fi
Re: SMD Soldering Feedback
« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2023, 07:34:05 am »
Yes, the right pad of C1 is pretty much spot-on.

The reason why blobbiness is bad is it hides whether the solder flowed into the PCB pad or not. It could be just a blob hanging on the component lead; or it could be actually connected to the PCB, you can't say by looking at it. Otherwise than that, excess solder does not matter. If you feel confident that you saw solder actually flowing and melting on the PCB pad and only applied too much after this, there is no need to rework IMHO.

And that's usually the biggest challenge, get the solder stick on the PCB, especially if the PCB has large polygon pours or multi-layer ground fills. In such cases, pre-heating the board to say 120-140degC (which does not hurt the PCB and other components even if held for a long time) helps tremendously, as does applying flux to the pads using a flux pen right before soldering.

Finally, hand-soldering is not a beauty contest. It's hobby/prototyping and most important is to recognize which problems truly reduce reliability. For example, R1 looks a bit ugly but it's 100% fine really. But C2 and C3 left pad leave a hanging question, are they connected to the PCB? Probably yes but can't be sure.
« Last Edit: June 11, 2023, 07:46:01 am by Siwastaja »
 

Online tautech

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 29469
  • Country: nz
  • Taupaki Technologies Ltd. Siglent Distributor NZ.
    • Taupaki Technologies Ltd.
Re: SMD Soldering Feedback
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2023, 07:44:26 am »
IMO all but the LH side of C11 have an unnecessary amount of solder on them.

You need set up a tip cleaner of brass or steel wool and use it to remove excess tip solder and by retouching joints remove excess to get a better shaped solder fillet that should never be higher than the component.

And BTW, welcome to the forum.
Avid Rabid Hobbyist.
Some stuff seen @ Siglent HQ cannot be shared.
 

Offline xavier60

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2983
  • Country: au
Re: SMD Soldering Feedback
« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2023, 08:06:50 am »
I solder those sorts of SMD components using the same method. I use 0.6mm Sn63/Pb37 rosin core solders with a Hakko T18-S4 tip set to 350°C. The spikes and other unevenness is caused by low tip temperature and by not using extra flux. Generally, the flux contained in solders is only active while the solder wire is first being melted. When the blob is remelted, the flux fails to keep the solder from oxidizing, preventing the molten solder from forming a smooth fillet.
It's difficult to control the amount of applied solder if it's too thick.
I use CAIG Rosin Soldering Flux RSF-R80.
HP 54645A dso, Fluke 87V dmm,  Agilent U8002A psu,  FY6600 function gen,  Brymen BM857S, HAKKO FM-204, New! HAKKO FX-971.
 

Offline agehall

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 390
  • Country: se
Re: SMD Soldering Feedback
« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2023, 08:49:36 am »
Not too bad. C1 is, as said, pretty much spot on. Let me guess though - you didn’t use flux? It will help a lot if you apply good flux to the board before soldering.

To up your game even more, use hot air to allow surface tension to straighten out components after initial soldering. :)

That said, I would bet all of the joints are good. Too much solder and not 100% straight components when hand soldering isn’t a big deal ime.
 

Offline AndyBeez

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 857
  • Country: nu
Re: SMD Soldering Feedback
« Reply #5 on: June 11, 2023, 10:01:19 am »
For hand soldering that's a very good effort, especially with pesky hotter melting lead free solder :-+

If you don't already have a solder flux pen, get one. Flux is good. Plus, obtain some IPA (isopropyl alcohol) to clean away the surplus flux afterwards.

Don't over work SMTs. If it looks wrong, remove the part and start again.

Plus, if you're designing your own PCBs, choose SMD pads described "for hand soldering", as the copper area is helpfully larger.

Keep on with the steady hand  ;D
 

Online xrunner

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7713
  • Country: us
  • hp>Agilent>Keysight>???
Re: SMD Soldering Feedback
« Reply #6 on: June 11, 2023, 10:56:13 am »
Not bad overall. When you see something like the right hand side of C3 and C4 going on, you can put a little flux on and touch it up.
I told my friends I could teach them to be funny, but they all just laughed at me.
 

Offline mariush

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5141
  • Country: ro
  • .
Re: SMD Soldering Feedback
« Reply #7 on: June 11, 2023, 11:43:54 am »
The ceramic capacitors are too small for the footprint.

Indeed, you're using a bit too much solder, probably you're using a thick gauge solder wire, try going down to 0.5mm-ish or 0.38mm solder wire, it may help a lot.  T18-S4 is conical, which is somewhat of a negative, other shapes are better for surface mount components. Maybe T18-D12 would work better: https://hakkousa.com/products/soldering/soldering-tips/t18-d12-chisel-tip.html

Maybe this series would help 


 

Offline xavier60

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2983
  • Country: au
Re: SMD Soldering Feedback
« Reply #8 on: June 11, 2023, 11:58:16 am »
Why is the T18-S4 being conical a negative? It's a very versatile tip, suitable for small SMD and much larger joints.

More here: https://www.eevblog.com/forum/reviews/hakko-fx-888d-and-t18-bl-tip/msg3462698/#msg3462698
« Last Edit: June 11, 2023, 01:19:33 pm by xavier60 »
HP 54645A dso, Fluke 87V dmm,  Agilent U8002A psu,  FY6600 function gen,  Brymen BM857S, HAKKO FM-204, New! HAKKO FX-971.
 

Offline janoc

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3885
  • Country: de
Re: SMD Soldering Feedback
« Reply #9 on: June 11, 2023, 03:18:11 pm »
Why is the T18-S4 being conical a negative? It's a very versatile tip, suitable for small SMD and much larger joints.


Conical tips in general are difficult to work with because you don't get sufficient transfer of heat to the joint. To even get the solder to melt you have to apply the tip sideways to the joint - and that may not be easily doable on a crowded board (incidentally that's also why various "bent" tips exist).

You will get a lot better results with a chisel ("screwdriver") style tip. Don't fall into the trap of thinking that for SMD you need extremely fine and pointy tips, that's completely false.
 
The following users thanked this post: tooki, Jwillis

Offline xavier60

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2983
  • Country: au
Re: SMD Soldering Feedback
« Reply #10 on: June 11, 2023, 03:31:55 pm »
Why is the T18-S4 being conical a negative? It's a very versatile tip, suitable for small SMD and much larger joints.


Conical tips in general are difficult to work with because you don't get sufficient transfer of heat to the joint. To even get the solder to melt you have to apply the tip sideways to the joint - and that may not be easily doable on a crowded board (incidentally that's also why various "bent" tips exist).

You will get a lot better results with a chisel ("screwdriver") style tip. Don't fall into the trap of thinking that for SMD you need extremely fine and pointy tips, that's completely false.
Have you tried a T18-S4 tip? I have been using them for years and there is no problem with thermal transfer to any type of joint even though it does need to make side contact.
HP 54645A dso, Fluke 87V dmm,  Agilent U8002A psu,  FY6600 function gen,  Brymen BM857S, HAKKO FM-204, New! HAKKO FX-971.
 

Offline tooki

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 12703
  • Country: ch
Re: SMD Soldering Feedback
« Reply #11 on: June 11, 2023, 03:40:45 pm »
IMO all but the LH side of C11 have an unnecessary amount of solder on them.
Agreed. It should be concave.

With that said, it also depends on pad geometry and component size. It’s really hard to hand-solder an 0402 with small pads and still maintain a convex fillet.

So in practice, as long as it’s not a bulging blob, don’t worry about it too much.

As for the solder spikes: use more flux, but also, if you ever see them happening, re-tin your tip. Two things cause the spikes: oxidation and solder “contamination” from copper, gold, etc from pads and component leads dissolving into the solder, which happens more if you take too long (which is normal when starting out!). The oxidation and/or unwanted dissolved metals change the properties for the worse. When you observe this, “rinse” your tip with fresh solder so that it drips off, wipe clean, rinse again, wipe again, and then re-tin with a small amount of solder to protect the tip and to act as a thermal bridge.

Also, another comment correctly said that too low a tip temperature can cause spikes, and that’s absolutely true. But what’s also true is that too high a temperature can cause them, because higher temperatures promote both faster oxidation and the aforementioned contamination. So you want a temperate that is as low as possible, but as high as needed. It’s all about finding that middle ground, which is something you do constantly since it depends on the tip in use as well as the solder joint itself.
 
The following users thanked this post: Jwillis

Offline tooki

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 12703
  • Country: ch
Re: SMD Soldering Feedback
« Reply #12 on: June 11, 2023, 03:43:59 pm »
Why is the T18-S4 being conical a negative? It's a very versatile tip, suitable for small SMD and much larger joints.
I don’t understand why people torture themselves with conical tips. I don’t find them to be superior for anything, other than maybe melting round holes into plastic or hot-pressing-in brass threaded inserts…
 
The following users thanked this post: janoc, tautech

Offline xavier60

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2983
  • Country: au
HP 54645A dso, Fluke 87V dmm,  Agilent U8002A psu,  FY6600 function gen,  Brymen BM857S, HAKKO FM-204, New! HAKKO FX-971.
 

Offline tooki

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 12703
  • Country: ch
Re: SMD Soldering Feedback
« Reply #14 on: June 11, 2023, 03:56:10 pm »
It's not your typical long pointy useless tip.
https://core-electronics.com.au/hakko-t18-s4-soldering-tip.html?gclid=CjwKCAjw4ZWkBhA4EiwAVJXwqc885qEimp3MvvJ700BukX6wlhbQqUvdjvzeqYm_NU0artWf1RmbARoCBEYQAvD_BwE
I know it’s not a long pencil tip, but a stubbier conical. But I still don’t see why one would want that shape when better ones are available.
 
The following users thanked this post: janoc

Offline Jwillis

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1716
  • Country: ca
Re: SMD Soldering Feedback
« Reply #15 on: June 11, 2023, 05:38:54 pm »
Your practice soldering doesn't look to bad . Don't be afraid to use extra flux. Spiking ,pitting and dulling can all be attributed to oxidation. Everyone will have their own preferences on brand but I find a liquid or gel for SMD  and a basic rosin paste for through hole work just fine.
Chisel tips for SMD  work the best for me. A 1.8mm, 2.4mm or 3.2mm chisel depending on package size.
If your still getting a lot of solder blobbing try reducing the size of your solder wire. Usually a .8mm diameter is plenty for package sizes of 1225 down to 0805. Reducing the solder size down to .4mm for package sizes less than 0805 helps me.
If you find that your trouble keeping the component in place a SMD adhesive might help. It also helps to keep the component from lifting on one side because of the contraction of cooling solder on the other side.

 

Offline gsgxTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 15
  • Country: us
Re: SMD Soldering Feedback
« Reply #16 on: June 11, 2023, 07:32:09 pm »
Thanks everyone for the advice and the support :)

I've been using a chisel tip, I tried a conical but it was definitely more difficult. I should also mention I'm using a $20 soldering iron I bought around 7 years ago, so I definitely don't trust the accuracy of its temperature and I don't have a thermocouple to check it. It also doesn't have the feature where when you set it down it automatically cools down, so I can also see that leading to some problems with oxidation if I didn't thoroughly clean the tip between placing a component and soldering it (don't worry, a "proper" soldering station will be my next purchase :) ).

Regarding using hot air, I had purchased an Atten ST-862D but I'm still waiting to receive it. I'm hoping I get it next week to test it out.

Yes, the right pad of C1 is pretty much spot-on.

The reason why blobbiness is bad is it hides whether the solder flowed into the PCB pad or not. It could be just a blob hanging on the component lead; or it could be actually connected to the PCB, you can't say by looking at it. Otherwise than that, excess solder does not matter.

Finally, hand-soldering is not a beauty contest. It's hobby/prototyping and most important is to recognize which problems truly reduce reliability. For example, R1 looks a bit ugly but it's 100% fine really. But C2 and C3 left pad leave a hanging question, are they connected to the PCB? Probably yes but can't be sure.

Thanks, I wasn't sure about the blobby joints, but this helps me understand what the problem with them might be. And this definitely makes me feel less self-conscious about how it looks  :)

IMO all but the LH side of C11 have an unnecessary amount of solder on them.

You need set up a tip cleaner of brass or steel wool and use it to remove excess tip solder and by retouching joints remove excess to get a better shaped solder fillet that should never be higher than the component.

And BTW, welcome to the forum.

I've been using brass wool for cleaning, but will be more mindful of this going forward. Also I wasn't sure if the solder should just cover the top edge of the component or be below it, will try to keep it below the top edge in the future and to keep it concave. And thanks for the welcome  :)

One question about this comment:
Two things cause the spikes: oxidation and solder “contamination” from copper, gold, etc from pads and component leads dissolving into the solder, which happens more if you take too long (which is normal when starting out!). The oxidation and/or unwanted dissolved metals change the properties for the worse. When you observe this, “rinse” your tip with fresh solder so that it drips off, wipe clean, rinse again, wipe again, and then re-tin with a small amount of solder to protect the tip and to act as a thermal bridge.

The solder contamination could definitely be a factor, I'm still getting a feel for how long to hold the iron to the pad. Other than cleaning and re-tinning the tip, if I suspect this contamination should I attempt to remove the solder with some solder wick first or should I not worry about that?

Overall, I think the main things for me to focus on are keeping the tip clean and free of oxidation and adding enough flux. I've tried a flux pen in the past (SRA #99-20 RMA Rosin Flux Pen), and while I found it much more convenient than tacky flux, I found that the tacky flux produced better results for me (MG Chemicals 8341 No Clean Flux Paste). But I'll try both again with some different brands.

Thanks again everyone!
« Last Edit: June 11, 2023, 07:34:40 pm by gsgx »
 

Offline mariush

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5141
  • Country: ro
  • .
Re: SMD Soldering Feedback
« Reply #17 on: June 11, 2023, 07:32:59 pm »
Why is the T18-S4 being conical a negative? It's a very versatile tip, suitable for small SMD and much larger joints.

More here: https://www.eevblog.com/forum/reviews/hakko-fx-888d-and-t18-bl-tip/msg3462698/#msg3462698

I said somewhat, because it's not the worst choice, but there are better choices.  It's about thermal mass, how much of surface is in contact with the component and the pad and other factors, like how well can it be used for drag soldering or for soldering a QFN package (lots of leads close together, a chisel tip could be used to solder the leads easily while the conical would be harder to use)

Some tips about choosing the right tip:




 

Offline xavier60

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2983
  • Country: au
Re: SMD Soldering Feedback
« Reply #18 on: June 11, 2023, 08:18:00 pm »
This is an example of what the T18-S4 tip is capable of.
The brass screws are M5x25. The the PCB is 2oz copper. The tip has good heat transfer. I have since started using a large chisel tip.
So the T18-S4 has no trouble at all with small SMD components.
This member also understands the useful attributes of the T18-S4.
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/reviews/hakko-fx-888d-and-t18-bl-tip/msg3462698/#msg3462698
« Last Edit: July 02, 2023, 11:50:48 pm by xavier60 »
HP 54645A dso, Fluke 87V dmm,  Agilent U8002A psu,  FY6600 function gen,  Brymen BM857S, HAKKO FM-204, New! HAKKO FX-971.
 

Offline janoc

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3885
  • Country: de
Re: SMD Soldering Feedback
« Reply #19 on: June 11, 2023, 08:45:50 pm »
Why is the T18-S4 being conical a negative? It's a very versatile tip, suitable for small SMD and much larger joints.
I don’t understand why people torture themselves with conical tips. I don’t find them to be superior for anything, other than maybe melting round holes into plastic or hot-pressing-in brass threaded inserts…

Oh you don't want to use conical tips for inserts! The insert will get stuck on the tip and you are screwed, likely destroying your work trying to remove it. For inserts there are special cylindrical tips.
 
The following users thanked this post: tooki

Online tautech

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 29469
  • Country: nz
  • Taupaki Technologies Ltd. Siglent Distributor NZ.
    • Taupaki Technologies Ltd.
Re: SMD Soldering Feedback
« Reply #20 on: June 11, 2023, 08:45:56 pm »
Thanks everyone for the advice and the support :)

I've been using a chisel tip, I tried a conical but it was definitely more difficult.
:-+ You're on the right track.
IMO all but the LH side of C11 have an unnecessary amount of solder on them.

You need set up a tip cleaner of brass or steel wool and use it to remove excess tip solder and by retouching joints remove excess to get a better shaped solder fillet that should never be higher than the component.

And BTW, welcome to the forum.
I've been using brass wool for cleaning, but will be more mindful of this going forward. Also I wasn't sure if the solder should just cover the top edge of the component or be below it, will try to keep it below the top edge in the future and to keep it concave. And thanks for the welcome  :)
Examine commercially built PCB's for guidance.

I too use chisel tips but only down to 0603 where I'm not interested in any going finer.
The corner contact of a 2.4mm tip gets the job done just fine with sufficient thermal mass to also take on larger components.

About my tip cleaning comments, a small tub with tip cleaner brass/stainless wool and a plunge or 2 into it will strip the tip of all solder and retouching previously made joints will pull a little solder from them so to get a better fillet.
A friend gave me a small ceramic cup for tip cleaner wool that has sufficient mass to stay where its put when cleaning tips.  :)
Otherwise a small tin weighted down with molten lead can serve the same purpose.

A few small tweaks make for a more enjoyable soldering experience....have fun as it should never be a chore.
Avid Rabid Hobbyist.
Some stuff seen @ Siglent HQ cannot be shared.
 

Offline Old Printer

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 769
  • Country: us
Re: SMD Soldering Feedback
« Reply #21 on: June 12, 2023, 03:17:19 pm »
Curious if you for-see a need to use lead free solder? Many hobbyists opt for the old standard 60/40 which is easier for a beginner to master. Good lighting and possibly magnification are also a couple of important ingredients that are easy to overlook. Check out some YouTube vids by Louis Rossmann, he is a bit of a guru in reworking SMD and a big liquid flux proponent.
 

Offline gsgxTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 15
  • Country: us
Re: SMD Soldering Feedback
« Reply #22 on: June 12, 2023, 04:30:11 pm »
Curious if you for-see a need to use lead free solder? Many hobbyists opt for the old standard 60/40 which is easier for a beginner to master. Good lighting and possibly magnification are also a couple of important ingredients that are easy to overlook. Check out some YouTube vids by Louis Rossmann, he is a bit of a guru in reworking SMD and a big liquid flux proponent.
I'm mainly using lead-free solder because I have cats and I'm worried of them getting lead poisoning. I make sure to thoroughly clean my soldering space, put away anything that would have solder on it, and only allow them in that area supervised, but I don't want a mistake on my part to end up being lethal. Of course, even digesting lead-free solder is bad for them, but it's not as lethal as lead solder.

And yea, Louis's videos have been very helpful  :)
 

Offline Old Printer

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 769
  • Country: us
Re: SMD Soldering Feedback
« Reply #23 on: June 12, 2023, 06:14:14 pm »
Gotcha on the cat thing, got a puppy myself that needs to be considered and honestly did not think about her getting into solder, but she eats everything so I should.
 

Offline EPAIII

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1156
  • Country: us
Re: SMD Soldering Feedback
« Reply #24 on: June 13, 2023, 09:29:49 am »
While there certainly are dangers associated with lead, I have to say that the need for lead free solder in hobby electronics is certainly minimal. We don't need tons of lead on millions of commercial circuit boards leaching into our water table from land fills. But the use of lead based solder on the few boards that hobbyists make is not going to cause any damage to either them or the environment. I have worked with electronics and used lead based solder for over 65 years, often on a daily basis and am still quite OK.

As for cats, I can't say. Would they lick and lick and lick any droppings? I don't know. I once saw a duck that drank from an open container of anti freeze that was left unguarded. He only got about three feet from it. So animals can be caught by dangers that humans would never fall for. But it is still difficult to see how they could get enough lead from any single encounter. They can't get much with a lick and any pieces they swallow would pass through with 99.9% of the original lead remaining in the piece. The children who got lead poisoning did not eat just one paint chip.
« Last Edit: June 13, 2023, 09:34:55 am by EPAIII »
Paul A.  -   SE Texas
And if you look REAL close at an analog signal,
You will find that it has discrete steps.
 
The following users thanked this post: tooki


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf