Thanks for your quick reply. I'm aware of LoRa but actually are not sure if i want to use it. First of all i'm not aware if LoRa is suitable for mesh networks. Then it is more expensive and the data rate seems to be quite low.
On the other side:
EPS-NOW as well as BLE Mesh claim to work up to a range of 800-1000m meshable and having a higher data-rate.
Range of LoRa is so good that you don't need mesh networking - because 5 hectares can be covered with single LoRa base station. Avoiding mesh will greatly reduce complexity meaning Lora in the end will not be that expensive as you say.
Plus, nothing which was originally described needs more data than a Lora radio can handle.
To help clarify, the range for LoRa is around 3km in urban and 7km in rural. With good antennas it can go even farther.
As far as the datarate, let's assume you have 20 things you're monitoring, each can be represented in no more than 16 bits. That's 320 bits. Even if everything polls once per second, you've got more than enough bits in Lora to do this.
There's a big misunderstanding about how many bits/s are needed. Generally things like you described really don't need to be polled more than once every few minutes, and often once an hour or once a day is fine. If you were to poll those same 320 bits of data over a minute, you only are transmitting around 6 bits per second.
Note that there is often some confusion between Lora and LoraWAN. You may or may not need/want the WAN functions. Lora is the data radio, LoraWAN is a protocol layered on top of it.
One thing you also should be aware of is that implementing mesh on any protocol degrades the throughput. There are several articles out there that describe the practical throughput of BLE mesh and most end up under 5kb/s, which is in the same realm as Lora.