Author Topic: which to go with: free simulator or breadpart and parts?  (Read 3426 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline doctormTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 57
which to go with: free simulator or breadpart and parts?
« on: January 27, 2011, 12:10:58 am »
im starting out learning about electronics and im doing well so far but the book i read saida bout getting a simulator or breadboard and parts to better understand what is going on.

so what do ya'll suggest?
 

Offline Mechatrommer

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11712
  • Country: my
  • reassessing directives...
Re: which to go with: free simulator or breadpart and parts?
« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2011, 12:13:04 am »
i suggest you follow what the book suggest.
Nature: Evolution and the Illusion of Randomness (Stephen L. Talbott): Its now indisputable that... organisms “expertise” contextualizes its genome, and its nonsense to say that these powers are under the control of the genome being contextualized - Barbara McClintock
 

Offline Time

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 725
  • Country: us
Re: which to go with: free simulator or breadpart and parts?
« Reply #2 on: January 27, 2011, 12:15:55 am »
Get parts and start doing basic stuff like learning to use a mutimeter by building basic circuits and measuring.  If your simulator is free you might as well use both in tandem.
-Time
 

Offline dimlow

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 301
  • Country: gb
  • Likes to be thought of as
    • Dimlow Ponders
Re: which to go with: free simulator or breadpart and parts?
« Reply #3 on: January 27, 2011, 06:03:15 am »
design,experiment in the sim, then build, power and let the magic smoke out on the bread board.
 

Offline tyblu

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 287
  • Country: 00
    • blog.tyblu.ca
Re: which to go with: free simulator or breadpart and parts?
« Reply #4 on: January 27, 2011, 06:24:15 am »
I'd say simulate the easy stuff, like RC/RL networks, but simulate and breadboard more complex circuits in order to appreciate how variations in values affect the output. For example, LC/RLC, op amp, or transistor circuits. I often simulate with SPICE to optimize values, then prototype & fix.
Tyler Lucas, electronics hobbyist
 

Offline Bored@Work

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3932
  • Country: 00
Re: which to go with: free simulator or breadpart and parts?
« Reply #5 on: January 27, 2011, 06:40:41 am »
Real parts.

Simulators require experience to interpret their results. They can easily produce rubbish output. How do you get experience? With real parts only.

Further, simulator armchair developers tend to optimize their simulations to the max, not taking into account that real parts have tolerances and maxing out parts in a simulation is a sure guarantee the thing won't work in the real world.
I delete PMs unread. If you have something to say, say it in public.
For all else: Profile->[Modify Profile]Buddies/Ignore List->Edit Ignore List
 

Offline Longhair

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 80
Re: which to go with: free simulator or breadpart and parts?
« Reply #6 on: January 28, 2011, 11:12:24 pm »
Using a breadboard will force you to understand space limitations.
 

Offline Neilm

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1559
  • Country: gb
Re: which to go with: free simulator or breadpart and parts?
« Reply #7 on: January 29, 2011, 10:53:49 am »
I always like to simulate circuits before I build them. The simulation shows that you have gotten the basic circuit correct. Then you build the breadboard and find all the real world stuff that free simulators tend to ignore.

Neil
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe. - Albert Einstein
Tesla referral code https://ts.la/neil53539
 

Offline Simon

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 18083
  • Country: gb
  • Did that just blow up? No? might work after all !!
    • Simon's Electronics
Re: which to go with: free simulator or breadpart and parts?
« Reply #8 on: January 30, 2011, 08:32:01 am »
I'd use a breadboard, simulators are just that, they simulate and don't always take into account real life variables or they do so strictly that you can't figure out why a circuit is not working. I ran a simulation once on a circuit with a led output and got the resistor value a bit wrong. Because the led was modelled to light up only after a certain current where as in real life it will light up with less but not so bright my circuit appeared not to work. It took me some time to figure it out.

I say use the breadboard, unless you don't have the parts or need to have a strictly theorectical analysis of an idea. For example I'd knock up a quike simulation to demonstrate back EMF which would look far scarier in a simulation with perfect parts than in real life where real component carachteristics get in the way of that lovely 5KV soike and only make 400V
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf