The editorial is almost always often "Leo Simpson on Politics"... Not "Leo Simpson on Electronics".
I am not that interested in the politics of my country, so I am really not interested in Leo's opinion of your politics.
He did an article ranting about the ranters here:
http://www.siliconchip.com.au/Issue/2016/December
Thanks Dave, I hadn't seen that issue yet.
Leo really hasn't solved anything, more foot in mouth disease.
I cannot escape the fact he is on the wrong side of politics for most of the electronics industry, who want to innovate or supply new technology.
Preempting the results of an article on batteries he hasn't even publish yet, wow fail.
Saying a 46 year old brown coal fired power station (due to be shunt down real soon) is "not particularly old", is just weird. Just how old does a vital "base load" generator need to be before it's retired then Leo ?
Yeah subscribed to SC many many years ago, gave up because:
1) Projects were a lot like Cable TV, after the first year everything repeats (projects based on ideas from past ones).
2) If you just buy the kit you want in the shop, you get the article anyway.
3) Projects with propriety parts, or stuff from the e-surplus shop who's name escapes me.
4) The Serviceman was the only part I read consistently.
5) Better off spending money on actual electronics.
6) Leo Simpson's ink wasting column and occasional entire articles.