When you have those two standards, what you can do only is adjustment, and limited validation (calibration), at these two values. All other validations are missing. While there is some guidance in the US (MIL use) that adjustment is sufficient every second time an item with artifact calibration needs adjustment/calibration, this is not necessarily good practice. So in the case of the initiator of this post, at least all DCV ranges should be verified.
Secondly, many cal labs use inadequate gear to do so, i.e. the uncertainties are too high. You cannot use a Fluke 5500 or 5700 to do that, as some labs do(!). Even a 5720/5730 is challenged. If one wants to do it properly, with low uncertainties, a lot of manual work is needed, and gear with low cal uncertainties. That is inconvenient of course, most labs these days being used to do some connections and run a software. E.g. validating the DCV range is best done with a 4910 DC standard (or similar; with low uncertainties not only for the 10V but also for 1V) for the 1V/10V range, and a very stable source for the other voltages, with 1kV being the least critical due to the high 3458A uncertainties in that range. So for 0.1V and 100V, e.g. a Fluke 752 and its low uncertainty, in combination with a stable source, may be used. Or a good low uncertainty DC calibrator. For DC current e.g., it is way more precise to use a set of precision shunt resistors and measure the shunt voltage (after referencing the meter to a DC standard) than just using a DCI calibrator. This is how we do it, but all this takes time. Still there are cal labs out there (many, I would say) that charge a lot of money, but do it the cheap way, and you may find out that you have a problem later. So when you have your 3458A calibrated, ask the right questions before you place the order.